Save Elsenham & Henham Villages Harvest time

Home
Consultation 2010
About this Site
Blackboard
Contact Us
History So Far
The Four Options
Events
Fund Raising
J.P. Meetings
Useful Links
Archive Page

 

Links to other items on this page.
| Another Consultation on the way | Extension to Deadline | February Floods| Village Meeting | U.D.C. Environment Committee January Meeting| Henham Dads Disco | Boxing Day Walk | U.D.C. Environment Committee November Meeting | Road Shows and Consultation | We are on the shortlist | Fairfield Consultation/Presentation|Questionnaire  | Decision on Eco-towns - 2009 |One Square mile of wheat | Flooding | Caroline Flint Visits Uttlesford | Rally in London - End of Consultation Period| E.C.C. Slams Eco Town in Elsenham |New Judicial Review Launched | Jonathan's great Power-point Presentation |East of England Plan | E-Petitions | The NIMBY|
(Note - many of the items that have previously appeared on this page have been transferred either to the Archive page or the History page.)

horizontal rule

 


Chairman's Update - 11th May 2012

Dear All

At a Cabinet Meeting of the Uttlesford District Council held last night (10th May 2012), the infamous 'Option 4' was rejected as the Districts Local Development Framework (LDF) strategy in favour of a hierarchical approach. This decision is still subject to the next housing consultation commencing on 8th June. It will be essential that residents respond to this consultation supporting this Cabinet decision.

We can no doubt expect a planning application to be submitted by Fairfield, in an attempt to overturn this fair and open LDF process. The Joint Parish Council Committee is working to prepare for this application and will publish details as they emerge. Meanwhile please wait for advice on how to respond to the next consultation

Nick Baker

Chairman

 
(Update - with reference to the meeting  below, the Dispersal Option was passed to the Cabinet (see above) on an 8 to 1 vote)

Scrutiny Committee - 8th May 2012

The Scrutiny Committee of Uttlesford District Council will discuss and recommend a Distribution Strategy for the Local Plan.  A very important meeting which could see the beginning of the demise of the infamous Option 4 in favour of a dispersed housing strategy.

Please see the following documents

Item 5 - Distribution Strategy for Local Plan

Item 5 - Distribution Strategy for Local Plan Appendix

horizontal rule

 

Chairman’s Update - 29th February 2012

On the 5th March we come to the end of the current consultation on the Local Development Framework. If you haven’t responded yet please do so immediately. We need a response from every member of the household please.

Fairfield, the Developer of Option 4, have produced a glossy brochure extolling the advantages of their development. They sent the brochure through the Royal Mail to every household in Uttlesford.  They produced the brochure in the Uttlesford District Council (U.D.C) consultation colours, trying to convince residents that it was an official consultation document from U.D.C. U.D.C have issued a disclaimer on their website.  Fairfield's message to Uttlesford residents?  If you support development in Elsenham, U.D.C won’t need to put more development in your area. What a cynical approach, they are unable to support their development on grounds that it is the right development in the right place, so they resort to blackmail. What lovely people to work with! If this doesn’t make you cross enough to put pen to paper nothing will.

The J.P.C.S.G Parish Councils have responded to the consultation and are reassured that the right decision will be made by U.D.C. We can expect a planning application from Fairfield in the future, but are confident it will be rejected.

Nick Baker

Chairman JPCSG
 

 
Developing Uttlesford Consultation
 20th Jan to 5th March

Dear All

Our campaign seems to have been littered with requests to respond to consultations and as explained by Nick below, whilst we appear to have been successful up to now, we cannot relax as we enter the period of this latest one.

In the next few days the information packs from the Joint Parish Council Steering Group with be arriving through your letter boxes.  In preparing the advice contained therein we have yet again commissioned our expert to examine closely the latest U.D.C policy, source documents and consultation questions.  Enclosed in the packs you will find a summary of his advice together with a response form and another U.D.C questionnaire called ''About You" which apparently they are legally bound canvas you.

We ask you to pay close attention to the experts advice.  Be unambiguous in your contributions and as far as possible express your reasoning in your own words.

U.D.C have been very thorough in producing information which outlines the purpose of the consultation, and with providing links to related documents, etc. (Please click here to view). 

Particularly important is the section entitled, How do I get Involved?.  I will not repeat the information contained therein, but you will find links to the Limehouse Electronic System of responding and to the forms should use should you wish to answer by Email or by Post.  There is also an explanatory animated Site Tour should you wish to take it.

Whatever way you choose to take part please remember that it is essential we have as many responses as possible.  That means all members of your family.  The future of our villages and way of life depends on your contributions.

Please also remember that there are Public Exhibitions (10.00am to 8.00pm) on Developing Uttlesford on the following dates and locations.

Friday, 27 January - Community Information Centre, Thaxted
Monday 30 January - Church House, Newport
Tuesday 31 January - Foakes Hall, Great Dunmow
Thursday 2 February - Priors Green Community Centre, Takeley
Friday 3 February - Memorial Hall, Elsenham
Monday 6 February - Day Centre, Stansted
Tuesday 7 February - Town Hall, Saffron Walden
Thursday 9 February - Community Centre, Great Chesterford

BB

 

Chairman's Update 23rd January 2012

Dear All

The latest U.D.C consultation about the Local Development Framework (L.D.F) has started and runs until 5th March. This Consultation asks residents where they would like future housing in the District. It suggests a hierarchal system with Saffron Walden and Great Dunmow taking much of future development with seven key settlements taking some development.  Elsenham has been identified as a key settlement. It also identifies villages that are suitable for a scale of development that would reinforce their role as a local service centre, Henham is in this category. The infamous Option 4 is no longer the preferred option, but the housing land at this location is included in a list of sites across Uttlesford as having potential for housing development.

We need to respond to this latest consultation with the same energy and vigour we have achieved in the past. Our response to earlier consultations has changed the thinking on where the housing should be placed in Uttlesford. This is not the time to relax; we absolutely must get each and every resident to respond to this consultation. To this end the J.P.C.S.G (Save Our Village) campaign has prepared an pack which will be delivered to every household in Henham and Elsenham advising residents how to respond to the consultation. Also in the pack is advice on how to respond to the consultation questions. When you receive the pack please take a few minutes to respond.

We shall be collating the packs at OSCA in Henham on Thursday 26th January at 1900 hrs. If you can spare an hour to help us we would be more than grateful.

Nick Baker
Chairman J.P.C.S.G

 

 

 

Chairman's Update 21st December 2011

Hi everybody

As expected the Uttlesford District Council Cabinet met last night (20th) and approved the papers for the upcoming Local Development Framework (L.D.F) consultation. This action abandons the old L.D.F options including the infamous Option 4 and recommends a policy of sharing the housing needs across Uttlesford.  An exact housing figure is not as yet given.

The consultation on the new L.D.F starts on the 20th January and runs until the beginning of March. The J.P.C.S.G is meeting on the 12th January to help prepare the community on how best to respond to the consultation. Please do not respond to the consultation until you have read the recommendations we shall offer you. We expect to get something through your letterbox by the end of January.

Nick Baker
Chairman J.P.C.S.G
 

 
Further to Update below
The Agenda and Cabinet Papers for the Meeting on 20th December can be viewed by clicking here.  Apparently I have been advised that members of the public can attend Cabinet meetings and if so desired, speak/ask questions at the beginning of the meeting, subject to the usual 2 days notice.
Also, please see our District Councillors U.D.C update on the Henham website by clicking here

horizontal rule

 

Chairman's Report - December 2012

Hi All

I wonder if any of our supporters against the development in  Elsenham expected us to still be campaigning four Christmas's and New Year's later. Well we are, and although things have changed quite a lot, the threat of a development of some size is still real, and hasn't gone away. What has hopefully changed however is the Local Development Framework (L.D.F) document. The last draft L.D.F showed the infamous Option 4 as the preferred  Option by Uttlesford District Council (U.D.C). This is now changing and on 20th December the U.D.C Cabinet will consider a dispersal option for housing initially in eight settlements. You may remember that this has always been the favoured option of the 'Save Our Village' campaign,  If the Cabinet accept this dispersal option it will replace the present draft L.D.F and Option 4 will cease to exist.

The new L.D.F, with the dispersal option, will then be consulted on in exactly the same way that the Option 4 L.D.F was three years ago.. The timeframe is, consultation with residents between 20th January and 5th March. The results of the Residents Consultation will be analysed and published and proposals for the New L.D.F published by July/August.

None of these processes and procedures can stop Fairfield from applying for planning permission on the NE Elsenham land. However if Option 4 is no longer the preferred option on the new L.D.F, then we hope we can fight this planning application in a forceful manner, this time alongside U.D.C.

Your J.P.C.S.G will be meeting early in the New Year to discuss how to advise you to respond to the consultation. In the meanwhile the J.P.C.S.G wishes you a very Happy Christmas and wishes us all a very successful 2012.

Nick Baker

Chairman JPCSG 

 

 
Reply by Sir Alan Haselhurst MP to the letter of 22nd September
Click here to view - Click here to view a subsequent reply from Sir Alan

horizontal rule

Hi All

I encouraged you to sign the National Trust Petition. Can I also encourage you to send an e mail to the Government. It only takes a minute and the format can be found at the Campaign to Protect Rural England web site at www.cpre.org.uk

Nick (4th Oct 2011)

horizontal rule

Letter From Joint Parishes to Sir Alan Haselhurst, our MP.
22nd September 2011
Click here to view
 

Chairman's Report - September 2011

Hi All

You have probably seen from the newspapers and media that the planning issues advanced by the Coalition Government are out for public consultation. I don't suggest that you respond to the consultation as individuals, because it is a lengthy technical document and your Parish Council has responded on your behalf. However The National Trust  and various other bodies are up in arms at the Governments push to build houses with a 'presumption in favour of sustainable development' and I urge you to sign the National Trust petition at www.nationaltrust.org.uk/planning (see below). It is vital that the current plans are overturned and that the communities, who were promised that development would only go ahead with their consent, have their say in any planning process.

You may want to make your views known to Sir Alan Haslehurst . The JPCSG are writing to Sir Alan expressing our disquiet over the National Planning Policy Framework, and particularly the suggested presumption in favour of  sustainable development without local communities involvement.
Nick Baker

Chairman

JPCSG

 

horizontal rule

National Trust

The National Trust is campaigning for people to respond to the Government’s reform threats to our green spaces.  Join their petition by clicking here

horizontal rule

Sunday 7th August 2011

The Sunday Telegraph featured a well balanced full page article by Andrew Gilligan headed 'Developers get the green light after Tory about turn'. Prominent in the article was our campaign.  A condensed version (not including the picture of our protesters) can be found by clicking here.

As a personal aside, having just watched Country File on BBC which talked about food shortages and escalating prices of grain crops, what sort of 'political logic' could allow the concreting over of a square mile of fertile grain crop producing land? It beggars belief. - BB

horizontal rule

Option Four

Dear All

I thought it is probably time to update you on the infamous 'Option 4' and the latest position on the housing development.  As you know the attempt by U.D.C to rid us of the 'top down' housing figures failed, after a developer took the Government to Court and successfully argued that, until the figures were revoked by law they should stay.  So, until the Government pass the Localism Bill, the top down housing figures remain with us.  The Bill is expected to become law in April 2012.

However, we are now faced with the Government's new planning rules, published last week.  In an effort kick-start the economy, the Government is creating a presumption in favour of development. Yes, the Government has ended the hated top down targets that imposed estates on unwilling parts of the countryside.  Yes the Localism Bill will push power down to local people.  But, the Government's national planning policy framework says that local authorities must approve all proposals wherever possible, changing the default on development from "No" to "Yes" or if not why not?

  For the first time since the 1980's, this will make it harder for local people to oppose the schemes.

It is not yet clear what will actually be built.  Architects and developers, like all of us, are confused by the conflicts within government policies.  The Government has simplified 1,000 pages of planning policy down to 52.  The 52 pages are open to wide interpretation and the balance between developer, local authority and residents is likely to be thrashed out in appeal hearings, case by case.

Ministers clearly hope to encourage growth, placate the building trade and convince enlightened communities that they are 'empowered'.  Well we know what we want in this community and we will not hesitate to fight any suggestion of this development returning under these new planning changes.  The formulation of neighbourhood plans where the community articulates the housing needs was the backbone of  election promises.

Our fight continues

Nick Baker

Chairman JPCSG.

August 2011

horizontal rule

Chairman's Update

Dear Resident,

I thought it was time to update you on the present position with the proposed housing development in Elsenham. You will remember that any progress on the Local Development Framework (L.D.F) was suspended late last year, whilst Uttlesford District Council (U.D.C) conducted a housing numbers appraisal to ascertain exactly how many houses it needs for the period up to 2027. This work has now been completed and at the LDFG held on the 28th February a number was arrived at which the U.D.C planning officers felt would satisfy the Inquiry Inspector in due course that the L.D.F was 'sound'.  That number was  2,500 dwellings over the planned period to 2027 being a build rate of 295 per annum. It is interesting to note that the recent build rate is 430 per annum. This substantially reduces the rate of growth previously imposed by Labour Government targets from the additional 4,200 dwellings in the plan period, (over and above existing planning consents) to the 2500, now accepted by the District Council at the Environment Committee on the 17th March 2011.

You may ask that as the Housing figures have been reduced, why can't U.D.C just scrap the existing L.D.F including Options 3 and 4 and start again. I have asked this question and been assured that legally this cannot happen, but what can and will happen is that the L.D.F, with the new housing figures, will be consulted on again in October/ November 2011. It is plainly obvious that Option 4 no longer an option, as there is no need for a single settlement of 3200 dwellings as we only need 2500. However Options 1,2 and 3 are still on the table until the fresh consultation takes a new direction. Option 3 is potentially very damaging with 1400 houses and the fear that if they are built, the development could be added to in years beyond 2027.

However I asked U.D.C Planning for their comment, and although the answer is a little obscure, the statement finishes off on a optimistic note.

' Limited weight can be attached to consultation documents that are part of preparing a new development plan in determining planning applications, particularly where the response to consultation does not indicate general support for the proposed approach. Hopefully the reduced scale of housing growth on which the council will be consulting later this year will attract greater approval from communities. Reducing the scale of growth will necessitate a review of where it could best take place, as a new settlement would be too small to have the range of facilities its residents would need. These implications will need to form part of the planned consultations.'

I also asked our MP Sir Alan Haselhurst his view and he said, ' I welcome the council's decision to reduce the scale of it's housing plans in view of the impending disappearance of the Regional Spatial Strategy. Although there are legalities to be observed and procedures to be followed before a new L.D.F can be endorsed, it is clear to me that the slate has been effectively wiped clean. What is needed now is not what was needed on previous assumptions. So, if anyone asks me, I would say that options one, two, three and four are dead in the water'

Complicating all of these issues is the Budget announcement that seems to be at odds with the Governments stated policies on communities having a large say in local developments. The Budget seems to say that planning applications for developments would have a 'presumption of acceptance' with a much faster process than at present. In addition the Government is  offering District Councils large inducements to build more dwellings, especially affordable homes. We are taking professional advice on these matters.

So there you have it. Some cause for optimism but with an strong underlying message of caution. Your Save Our Village committee continues to work very hard to steer a path between these mixed messages. I am sorry this note is a little long, but best you are all updated in the fullest possible way.

Nick Baker

Chairman J.P.C.S.G

April 2011

horizontal rule

Dear All - Christmas 2010 was our fourth 'Option 4 Christmas'.  I wonder what was on your wish list for the coming year.  Best wishes and thank you for your continuing support. 
May 2011 see the end of it all.
 
 

 

Chairman's Report - November

Dear All

You may have seen that the Government lost a High Court case on Wednesday, which declared Eric Pickles action of abolishing the top down housing figures illegal. The case was brought by a number of building companies who had advanced planning permission for some large scale housing developments before they were cancelled by Local Authorities using the Pickles decision.

This decision shouldn't worry the Save our Village campaign as no planning applications are in place for the Elsenham development. The Government intend to enshrine the abolishment of the housing figures in a Communities Act which will starts it's passage through Parliament later this month. If developers apply for planning permission before this Act becomes law, expected to be in about 12 months time,  Local Authorities have to take the fact that the top down housing figures are about to be abolished in account when decided the planning application.

Nick Baker
12th November 2010

 

 

Chairman's Report - October

Dear All

We now enter what will be a quiet spell for the Save Our Village campaign. The decision at the Uttlesford Council Environment Committee means that a housing needs survey will be carried out to try and ascertain exactly how many houses are needed across Uttlesford. We hope that this survey will establish that there is no need for a single large development and that future housing needs can be met by planned growth across the towns and villages.

The Parish Councils in the Save our Village group, will be looking at whether they need to plan for some housing, including affordable housing, in their villages. This process can take place over the winter months.

We hope that common sense has now prevailed, and the threat of housing on the totally unsuitable site at Elsenham has gone for ever. We are determined that no creeping development takes place on the site, and that any development in the villages is conducted with the residents and Parish Councils. We will keep you updated with any news.

Nick Baker
October 2010

 
U.D.C Environment Committee Meeting - Tuesday 7th September 2010

Almost three years to the day when the Environment Committee introduced their notorious preferred Option 4, the residents of Henham and Elsenham turned out in large numbers to hear the latest progress on the Core Strategy.

Prior to the start of the meeting, our Chairman Nick Baker gave an excellent address to the committee which set out the feelings of the J.P.C.S.G, (click here to view). The Chair of the meeting, Councillor Barker, welcomed residents by saying that with the new government, 'we had a new opportunity to move towards a new plan'.  Roger Harborough, Uttlesford's Development Director summarised the latest consultation, which reinforced, yet again, the strong opposition to a single settlement. 

For the first time since I have been attending these meetings I found myself listening, (for the most part), to a constructive discussion on the change in planning obligations on local government and in particular, the motion before the committee which was, 'That a review of the scale of growth appropriate for Uttlesford be taken'.  The leader of the council, Councillor Ketteridge, proposed an amendment which read,  'That a review of the scale of growth appropriate for Uttlesford be taken and subsequently a location of that growth'.  He made the point that new guidelines from the government have yet to be published although it had been stressed that the 'top down' allocation of housing numbers was a thing of the past. 

It was also stated that the council believed that when the number of houses needed was calculated, the 2,500 houses already in the pipeline with planning permission be taken into account.

Various views were expressed including that parishes should be consulted on local need and location and any initiatives should not be 'development led'.  Councillor David Morson stressed the need for the political parties to work together for the good of Uttlesford.  He asked that a the committee should state that the threat of a single settlement be removed.  This was obviously met with great support from local residents.  Councillor Ketteridge again spoke and it seemed from what he was saying that we were back to the drawing board.  Addressing residents he said words to the effect of, 'I am not sure what you are worried about - you have got what you wanted'.  However, the Committee, for reasons best know to themselves and to the disappointment of residents, refused to categorically confirm that option 4 was no longer an issue.

For the first time that I can remember a motion relating to the issue passed unanimously.

That does this mean?  We will wait and see.  It seems that it will be at least a year before the housing need analysis becomes available and after that? - who knows. 

Perhaps maybe the 'Sword' of Damocles'  has been removed for the time being and replaced by a 'Penknife'.

B.B.

Subsequent to the above, in the front page article in September 9th's Dunmow and Stansted Observer, Steve Biart the director of land for the Fairfield Partnership apparently said that the company would still press ahead with its proposals.

Click here to view the agenda and relevant documents
Click here to go to U.D.C.'s Core Strategy page to view the results of the 2010 consultation

horizontal rule

 

 

Chairman's Update

Hi All,

This is a short note to update you on the present position with the housing at Elsenham. The results of the last consultation have now been published and can be found on the link on our website. You will be pleased to know that 64% of the responses were against Option 4, and generally, the responses to the related issues were in our favour.

Of course, since the end of the consultation, the Coalition Government have written to Councils taking away the obligation to built houses based on the last Governments top down figures. U.D.C have always said that their hands were tied by these housing figures, hence the Local Development Framework (L.D.F) and the threat of 3200 houses at Elsenham. In future U.D.C will be able to set their own housing figures based on the needs of the District.

The J.P.C.S.G agree with this approach and on Tuesday the 7th September at 1930 hrs at the U.D.C Council Offices, the Environment Committee will consider the results of the consultation and agree a way forward. The way forward, as recommended by the officers, is to park the present L.D.F process and conduct a housing needs study, which would report back in autumn 2011. Whilst this is sensible and the proper way to  start a housing review, we would rather see the present discredited present L.D.F abandoned and a new L.D.F started once the housing figures were known. We think it unreasonable to have the threat of housing hanging over our heads for another 2/3 years.

We would also like to see more co-operation between the political parties at U.D.C, and indeed more co-operation with the Parish and Town Councils, to resolve the issues once the scale of the problem is known. 

I would like to encourage you to attend the U.D.C meeting on Tuesday, it is important that we continue to show our elected members of the District Council that this threat of large scale housing in Elsenham is something that matters to the residents. I would like to see the council chambers packed.

Nick Baker

Chairman J.P.C.S.G

 

horizontal rule

They just won't go away will they
Land between Henham and Elsenham

From wheat field to Wheatfield Avenue, Elsenham?

What it could look like

   
Fairfield have written to Nick Baker stating their intention to pursue Option 4 and Nick has responded

Click here to see their letter
Click here to see Nick's response


This month's crop being harvested
(pictures courtesy of Jonathan Leech)

horizontal rule

SAVE OUR VILLAGE 2010

ISSUED BY THE JOINT PARISH COUNCILS STEERING GROUP

ELSENHAM/HENHAM HOUSING

DEVELOPMENT UPDATE JULY 2010

Now the general election is behind us we are waiting for the promises and commitments made by our politicians to come to fruition.  We have seen the Secretary of State for the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), Eric Pickles MP, has committed to abolishing the East of England housing plans.  However, we are told that Uttlesford District Council (U.D.C) is continuing with the Local Development Framework (L.D.F) consultation process which is due to finish in July 2010, followed by a report to be made at the September U.D.C Environment Committee.  This is in spite of many local authorities tearing up their plans based on Eric Pickles letter to all local authority chief planners.  The opportunity now being given by central Government is for local planning authorities to reconsider their housing requirement meaning that the Core Strategy needs only to find an additional 660 dwellings in the Uttlesford district and that the allocation for North East Elsenham is unnecessary. It is said that this continued commitment by U.D.C to its current L.D.F proposed solution (of Option 4, with 3000 homes at Elsenham and Henham) is due to their concern of legal action against them if they don’t continue.  Clearly, the instruction from Eric Pickles has fallen on deaf ears there!

 

We have been aware for almost a year that the Fairfield Partnership has been trying to sell their land bank which includes the land under option between Elsenham and Henham.  We are advised that negotiations are at an advanced stage for this land to be sold in its current form to private equity firm MGPA or Investor Revcap.  This is not good news for the Save Our Village campaign.  It means that at any time in the future, probably sooner than later, planning applications will be made to UDC to initiate development so that the buyers get a return on their investment.  This is now probably the biggest threat to our campaign as we will be dependant on U.D.C supporting a policy of developing housing to meet the needs of the Uttlesford community and not what developers want to do purely for profit at our expense.

 However, there is a considerable amount of land throughout the district which is under option by developers.  It is important that we keep U.D.C focussed on ensuring essential development in our communities is rational, proportionate and fair.

 The next important stage of the process is to ensure that U.D.C have listened to the government, the DCLG, our campaign and finally ditch their plans for L.D.F Options 3 and 4.  It will be much appreciated if as many people as possible attend the next U.D.C Environment Committee on:

 

7th SEPTEMBER 2010 AT 7.30PM - U.D.C OFFICES SAFFRON WALDEN

 We regret to say that we must now consider the Save Our Village campaign as a long term project.  This is due to the very serious threat from long term investors whose only interest is in getting a financial return by pushing for the fields between Elsenham and Henham to be covered in concrete.

 THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT.

 

horizontal rule

Letter from the Rt. Hon. Eric Pickles MP - Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government regarding abolition of Regional Strategies.
Click here to view.

Come on Uttlesford.  Now see sense and drop the seriously flawed Option 4, The Coalition Government don't want it, the local residents don't want it; the only people who do are the Developers.

horizontal rule


Where we stand following the election

Dear All

The J.P.C.S.G view is quite simple. The Conservatives told us that if they got into power they would get rid of the East of England top down housing figures and ask U.D.C to plan their own housing requirements bottom up. Sir Alan Haselhurst  repeated that promise in his election manifesto.

The Housing Minister Grant Shapps gave the public meetings at Elsenham and Henham the same message. We fully expect the coalition Government to honour these promises. The Liberal Democrats had a very similar policy, save some disagreement over social housing numbers. This must mean the end of Option 4 and back to a more sensible policy as outlined in the S.H.L.A.A. where U.D.C sets it's housing numbers in accordance with local needs.

There is a general agreement across the Parish Councils that we are all in need of building a sensible number of affordable homes to support local needs and support the existing infrastructures.

We now look to both the U.D.C Conservatives and the Government to honour their promises and design a sensible housing programme for U.D.C, which is supported by the people. Let this be an end to developer led, extremely large, daft, unwanted developments such as the Elsenham Option 4.

Nick Baker Chairman

 

 
Henham Fun Day in Aid of SOV Funds
Sunday 9th May 2010 at Woodend Green
 
The Red Barrows Bring it back to Blighty
'The Red Barrows' Terrestrial Display Team 'Bring it back to Blighty' World Cup song
(View Video)
   
Bouncy Castle Classic Cars
(View Video )
   
Many different stalls Henham Juniors win the Rally Rounders Martin Nicholson Shield for the third year running.
The trophy was presented by Mrs. Sylvia Nicholson
   
Yet again a really splendid Henham day on Woodend Green in aid of the Save Our Village Fund.  The weather was relatively kind to us and we were privileged to be entertained by the Footlights Dance Group, Mr. Happy, music by 'Double Vacant' and The Red Barrows display team from Essex who performed in aid of a cancer charity.  There were may stalls, an OSCA raffle and a splendid collection of very special motor vehicles.

Our thanks go to Gerry and Sheena Bigland, Karen George-Lafferty, Julie Churchouse, Clare Robertson who collectively style themselves as the 'Non Committee' for their excellent organisation together with compare Ed Byrne and all the others who helped in so many ways including the umpires of the Rally Rounders.

This year the total sum to be donated to the Save our Village fund was an excellent £634 and not £1040 as I previously reported. (I misunderstood the email I received - apologies)

Gerry Bigland and Ed Byrne
Gerry and Ed

horizontal rule

Fund Raising

I am very pleased to announce that the Spring Food Night raised £450 and that so far this year, the coffee mornings have raised £491.  A really splendid effort by all.

Tickets can now be obtained for the summer evening meal on Friday 2nd July from Jennifer on 814 434.

horizontal rule

 

Chairman's Report

21st April

Well the campaign is over for now and I want to thank all of you who submitted your questionnaires and our canvassers for their excellent work in helping villagers respond to the consultation.  U.D.C will realise, whether they want to hear it or not, that there is huge opposition across the District to this stupid, idiotic plan to place 3000 + houses at Elsenham.

I am much encouraged with the opposition to the proposed development from both  East Herts District Council and Bishops Stortford Town Council, who represent a market town only five miles from Elsenham and already swamped by development. We were also pleased to see the submission from Takeley Parish Council, an area which has also seen much disorganised development, which supports a development at Great Chesterfield rather than Elsenham. 

Well, we now await the results of the consultation and the impact on the situation from the General Election. I remain positive that good common sense will prevail, and much like the demise of the 2nd runway, we shall also see democracy in action and a just result. If not than I pledge that the J.P.C.S.G will fight this crazy development every inch of the way and with your support we shall win.

Nick Baker

Chairman JPCSG

 

 

horizontal rule

2010 Consultation

On Behalf of the Joint Parish Council Steering Group, may I thank the hundreds who responded to the latest Uttlesford District Council Consultation.  We can only hope that the message finally gets through to those advocating the preferred option just how much the people of Elsenham, Henham and surrounding villages and indeed further afield abhor the idea of this ill-conceived proposition. 
 

horizontal rule

 
Public Meetings at Elsenham and Henham and The Information Pack Collation

Two very good meetings took place  on Thursday 11th and Friday 12th March at Elsenham and Henham respectively.  In the region of a 100 people attended each. On the evening of Monday 15th , nearly 40 residents from both villages turned up at OSCA to put the information packs together and managed the job in under an hour.  Brilliant! Well done everybody.

For residents of Elsenham, Henham, Ugley and Widdington your letters should be with you in the next few days.

horizontal rule

2010 U.D.C Consultation

Please Visit the Consultation Page and Send in your Responses
Click Here

 

horizontal rule

What the Papers Say

Click here to view very good letters to the Herts and Essex Observer from Henham and Elsenham Councillors David Morson and Catherine Dean

Herts and Essex - click here to view

horizontal rule

Tuesday, 2 March - South Community Forum, Helena Romanes School, Great Dunmow
Click here to view a short recording of part of the above meeting - courtesy of Herts and Essex Observer.

horizontal rule

Nick Baker Speaks to Essex Radio
On Friday 19th February, shortly before 7.15am Nick was interviewed on Essex Radio concerning Option 4. For the next few days you can listen to what he said by clicking on the link below, starting the broadcast and using the slider, take it forward to about 1.13.20

Click here

horizontal rule

 

Uttlesford District Council Housing Consultation

Dear Resident

By now you will have received your Consultation Papers through your letterbox. They are addressed to the ‘Occupier’ so I hope you haven't thrown them away as junk mail!  The J.P.C.S.G is asking you at present to delay responding to the consultation which ends on 9th April. The reason for this is that we are busy meeting  with both planning and legal experts to give us best advice on how to respond to this. The documents issued for the consultation available on the U.D.C web site are detailed, and many of the assumptions need challenging by people who can understand the detail. We are doing this and by the middle of March we shall issue specific advice on how to respond.  

Public meetings are planned at Elsenham (11th) and Henham (12th) Village Halls on in March at 1930 hours, where we will have the opportunity to discuss the consultation in more detail.

Thank you for your patience

Nick Baker

Chairman J.P.C.S.G

horizontal rule

 

The Burns Night Supper, Friday 29 January 2010 at Elsenham Memorial Hall
Raised a grand total of £530.
A great effort by all concerned

 

Forthcoming Events - Click Here

horizontal rule

Uttlesford District Council Housing Consultation

The next consultation sponsored by Uttlesford district council takes place between

Monday 15th  February and Friday 9th April 2010

 U.D.C will be posting a brochure to each household in early February.

Please read it carefully, but we ask you not respond until you have received more information from the the experts employed by the the Joint Parish Council Steering Group.  We have yet to see the brochure, but our experts are currently analyzing the various studies, some of which have only become available recently.          

We will be organising Public Meetings in Henham and Elsenham as soon as we have all the information and updating you on this site.

Thank you for your continued support

horizontal rule

Uttlesford District Council Consultation - Info From Our Councillor, David Morson
Please see Latest District Council News from Cllr. David Morson regarding the next Consultation on the proposed housing plans of U.D.C.  due to start on 15th February.  As with previous consultations, The Joint Parish Council Steering Group ask residents to hold back on responding until we have taken advice from our consultants.  We will update you as soon as possible.

horizontal rule

Hard to believe, but we have just celebrated SOV's third Christmas.  Please be ready for a big effort in the new year for the next dreaded 'consultation.'

Happy New Year to you all and may 2010 be a good for our campaign

OSCA at Henham

horizontal rule

Draft Comparative Transport Assessment by Essex C.C.

Now available - click here to view 

horizontal rule

Another Consultation on the Way
(Environment Committee Meeting)

Agenda  - Item 2 - Core Strategy Consultation - Item 2(b) Option 4 - a suggested distribution of housing

On Tuesday 24th November 2009 the Environment Committee of U.D.C. met in the Council Chambers at London Road to consider the following recommendation.

1. That further consultation be carried out and the Preferred Options be reviewed in the light of the responses in mid 2010 before proceeding to submission.

2. That the consultation be on the basis

I.   that the Core Strategy assumes the Stansted Airport G1 development will be implemented

II.  that Option 4 comprise 3000 homes to the north east of Elsenham; 750 homes at Great Dunmow; 30 at Great Chesterford; 50 at Newport; 20 at Stansted Mountfitchet; 30 at Takeley; 30 at Thaxted and 90 distributed across other villages.

III. that the Preferred Options for Core Strategy Policies address the issues and include the proposed changes identified in the table in paragraph 20 of the report

3. That officers review the findings of the ongoing technical studies and bring a further report to the committee before consultation is launched should the findings indicate an adjustment to the preferred option may be required.

Whilst I and others did not fully understand the semantics of the ensuing discussion, on the suggestion of the Committee Vice Chairman, Councillor Howell from Saffron Walden (Audley), the recommendation was changed to a reduction to 500 houses at Great Dunmow and adding 250 houses at Saffron Walden. Whilst introducing his proposal for the change this Councillor stated he was in favour of the single settlement in Elsenham, it being 'the least unpalatable proposal'.  This beggars belief in view of the recently published technical reports. He also linked the need for these houses to the expansion of Stansted Airport.  Previously, the concept of an 'Airport Town' has been denied by U.D.C. and whilst this may be a personal view of the Councillor, I find it very worrying.

A number of speakers, including a representative from the campaign against the Boxted Wood development spoke eloquently and sensibly of the dangers of a single settlement anywhere. A recurring theme was that distribution of housing throughout the District was far more popular, sensible and sustainable.

The recommendation was passed (with the changes) and the Councillors who had spoken against the single settlement for some reason abstained rather that voting against.  I and others could not understand why.

We are now left with another consultation sometime in the new year of either 6 or 8 weeks with little or no detail on how/when it will be progressed, its range or how the views will submitted and collated.

We will keep you informed.

horizontal rule

Chairman's Update

The Water study is damning on development on the proposed site at Elsenham particularly in relation to ‘Wastewater’. Considerable major capacity upgrades would have to be made and the availability of land to support these upgrades may be an issue, as will achieving the necessary discharge consent standards. In addition, the sewers that approach the ‘Wastewater’ treatment site would be restricted from being upsized by the narrow streets and existing utilities, requiring the construction of new bypass sewers around the urban areas. The report identifies other potential building sites in Uttlesford that don't have these problems

We have not seen the Transport Study yet, but believe it follows the previous suggestion of all the traffic coming from the new development going down Hall Road to Takeley. We have always said this is daft as traffic going North will not want to head South first.  

So where does that leave us?  We await an opportunity to listen to U.D.C debating these reports in public. We will seek our own expert advice on the contents of the reports to challenge any maverick decisions. Meanwhile U.D.C go through a lengthy consultation process on where to put the 1200 houses required by the L.D.F. on top of the 3000 houses planned for  Elsenham. They have selected 6 options for the placement of these 1200 houses.

It was two years ago that U.D.C put us through the pain of a consultation over Christmas and the New Year. Vital, they said, that it had to be completed over that period!  We can expect further consultations in the New Year and we will have to be ready to respond. I thank the Villagers for continuing to hold events to fund raise for save our Villages, and I thank the hard working J.P.C.S.G committee for their continued efforts.

Everything we have been saying about the stupidity of a large development in Elsenham is now showing itself to be true. Only political dogma keeps the scheme going.

Nick Baker

Chairman

J.P.C.S.G - 23rd November

horizontal rule

STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT- 2008

Uttlesford District Council have published a draft report on land availability  in the district which they introduce as follows-

  1. This is the first Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) for Uttlesford District Council.  It is a study of potential housing on sites within the district over the period up to 2026.

  2. The SHLAA has been prepared in accordance with national Planning Policy Statement PPS3 “Housing”, a practice guidance published by the Government in July 2007, and more detailed guidance prepared by Uttlesford District Council.  This process has involved key stakeholder participation and a SHLAA Panel.  The SHLAA replaces the Uttlesford Urban Capacity Study 2005.

They ask for comments on the Draft Report be sent to Sarah Nicholas at snicholas@uttlesford.gov.uk or by post to the council offices, London Road, Saffron Walden CB11 4ER by September 18, 2009.  Both Henham and Elsenham PCs will be sending their observations.

To view the report and the appendices click here and then go half way down the page to Housing / Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment, which lists the report and its eight appendixes. Appendix 7 and 8 are the two documents of particular interest.  Appendix 7 is the table giving general details of potential sites in all villages and Appendix 8 opens the web page to the individual villages' Site Appraisal Sheets and Maps.

horizontal rule

Eco-towns Decision Statement
Click here to view the reasons for selection and particularly the DCLG opinions on Elsenham.  We are not out of the woods yet by any means. We will hold a Joint Parish Council Steering Group Meeting as soon as possible to discuss the way forward. - BB

horizontal rule

We are not on the Short List

Hi All

 Perhaps by now you will have seen the good news that NE Elsenham has not been selected as one of the first four Eco Towns to be given the go ahead. John Healy the DCLG Minister has selected  4 sites to be commenced fairly soon but  talks of a second wave of Eco Towns to be underway by 2020. We believe that we were selected as a special case because of the sensible logical arguments we made in the consultations. So for the moment the threat of an Eco Town has gone away, however it may return so we will keep alert to the situation and continue to articulate our case against.

The major threat to us now is Option 4 in the U.D.C plans. We must continue to fight this option and indeed any option which involves a large mass of housing at NE Elsenham. We have seen the latest plans from U.D.C which still supports Option 4. How can it be that the DCLG finds good reasons not to go ahead with an Eco Town on this site, yet U.D.C still supports the building of 3000 houses?

So reason to raise a glass today, but put away the rest of the bottle for the real celebration when we persuade U.D.C of the total madness of siting a mass of housing at NE Elsenham.

 Nick Baker

Chairman

16th July 08

Read the D.C.L.G statement - Click here

horizontal rule

Eco Petitions to 10 Downing Street
Remember the on-line petitions many of us sent last year to 10 Downing Street regarding objections to the siting of eco towns at Elsenham and Hanley Grange, these have now closed and replies have been sent out as follows.

Elsenham

Eco-towns present a unique opportunity to provide more affordable housing where it is needed, while pioneering new green ways of living that will act as a showcase for new development everywhere.

On 4 November 2008 the Department for Communities and Local Government published for consultation a Draft Eco-Towns Planning Policy Statement (PPS), Sustainability Appraisal (SA) and Impact Assessment.  In the accompanying press notice, the Housing Minister outlined the shortlist of locations with the potential to be an eco-town and this included North East Elsenham.  Our consultation on the draft Planning Policy Statement (PPS) and accompanying documentation closed on 30th April 2009.

We are now considering all representations before finalising the Eco-towns Planning Policy Statement later this year.  This will include the list of locations with potential to be an eco-town.  Along with these documents we will also publish a Government response to the consultation together with a summary report of responses received.  Following this individual schemes in the shortlisted locations will then need to submit planning applications, which will be for local authorities to determine through the planning process.

Hanley Grange

Since you submitted your petition on 17 April 2008 Hanley Grange has withdrawn from the eco-towns process, with the promoters deciding that they needed more time to develop their proposal.

While assessment of the location is included in the Sustainability Appraisal for Hanley Grange and Cambridgeshire published on 4th November 2008 the Government would not consider taking forward a scheme for this location before the next review of the East of England Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS).  The promoters would expect it to be considered as part of the planned review of the RSS.

Eco-towns present a unique opportunity to provide more affordable housing where it is needed, while pioneering new green ways of living that will act as a showcase for new development everywhere.  We hope that you were able to submit comments to the consultation on the draft Eco-towns Planning Policy Statement which ended on 30 April 2009. Further details can be found at

horizontal rule

Lord Hanningfield, Leader of Essex County Council, visits Henham
 
Lord Hanningfield On Wednesday 27th May, Lord Hanningfield, accompanied by our Essex County Councillor Ray Gooding came to Henham primarily to talk about the progress of the re-opened Post Office.
   
J.P.C.S.G Chairman Cllr Nick Baker, together with Cllr. Simon Lee were also present and the visit gave Nick the opportunity to question Lord Hanningfield about the Essex C.C. views on the proposed eco-town and on large scale housing developments. (See below)
 
When asked about the plan to build an eco-town between Henham and Elsenham he stated that Essex County Council was totally opposed to it and any other large developments which were not supported by appropriate infrastructure.  Clearly the N.E. Elsenham options did not come into that category. He did however recognise the need for appropriate developments, especially social housing but not on the scale that Uttlesford District Council proposed.  He looked forward to the time when the East of England Assembly and its Regional Plan would no longer exist and to the re-introduction of the County Council Structure Plan.
 

 

Chairman's Update

Hi All,

You may by now have thought that we've all gone away and the Save Our Village Campaign is over.  Far from it.  We are at the end of the DCLG consultation and are awaiting the results which are expected at the end of July. Having said that we have had so much slippage on dates, don't hold your breath.  We know we had a magnificent response to the consultation and if the DCLG take any notice of public consultations they can come to no other conclusion than scrap this scheme immediately.

We have had some support from the consultation response from SHELTER who have come out against an Eco Town in our location. They have selected 5 other sites which is helpful. Essex County Council have also come out strongly against the Eco Town in their response. Uttlesford DC have responded, but with their unresolved position on Option 4, they were regrettably unable to come out strongly against the Eco Town, very disappointing.

Ray Gooding our County Councillor, brought Lord Hanningfield, Leader of E.C.C. to Henham Post Office today 27th May and he was able to repeat his unequivocal opposition to both the Eco Town and the large settlement Options 4.  A change of Government, he said, would mean the end of both proposals.

So your committee continues to meet and plan for every possibility, and we will continue the fight until we are rid of these ridiculous building plans.

May I thank the Henham Fete Committee for a donation of £725 from the Village Fete, this together with other fund raising from the Elsenham Quiz, and other events in both Villages means we are funded to continue our fight.

Nick Baker

Chairman

 

 
Henham Fun Day raises over £775 for the Save Our Village campaign

Click here to view

horizontal rule

 

U.D.C. Full Council Meeting - Continued.
(see also below)

With reference to the comment below regarding the full council meeting held on Tuesday 21st April, Henham Councillor Simon Lee sent the following letter to the Herts and Essex Observer and it appeared in the Dunmow and Stansted addition.  He pulls no punches in very ably summing  up the views of the residents of Henham and Elsenham who attended the meeting.

Click here to read

horizontal rule

Letter received.

From Mr. Henry Cleary, Deputy Director of the Housing and Growth Programmes Team at the Department of Communities and Local Government   He acknowledges all our letters and sets out criteria for selecting eco-towns, although he does not give information when the choices will be made other than later this year.

Click here to view

horizontal rule

Tuesday 21st at April Uttlesford District Council - Full Council Meeting
Tuesday 21st April 7.30pm at Council Chambers

Minutes

Since our campaign started, in common with many other residents of Henham and Elsenham I have attended many council meetings and most of them have left us disappointed at the outcomes.  We have learnt to live with that, but along the road have become, to say the least, cynical.  Equally, as editor of this web site I have refrained from personal attacks on individuals whose attitudes and motivation I have found very hard to understand.

At the conclusion of voting on Item 8ii on the agenda i.e. "The Environment Committee resolved on 17 March 2009 to require a robust report to be submitted to this meeting rebutting the Elsenham eco-town proposal in response to the Government’s consultation on the Eco-towns Planning Policy Statement,"  I was perhaps the first out of the Council Chamber and watched the many residents file out in almost total silence.  Cynical and disillusioned as we had become, I sensed a new feeling towards what we had witnessed, which I can only describe as something bordering on contempt for local government politics.

Many of you have responded to the DCLG Consultation of their Draft Planning Policy statement prior to the previous deadline in March and it was only because of an extended deadline to 30th April that U.D.C. were pressured into a response of their own.  An accompanying briefing paper suggested four response options for the council to consider. Response Option Three was the only one that could be construed as a robust rejection of placing a Eco-town at North East Elsenham.

Prior to the meeting, Henham Parish Councillor Simon Lee urged the council to adopt Response Option Three as the only option that sent a unambiguous message to the DCLG.  When the debate started District Councillors Catherine Dean, David Morson and others repeated the message, but a motion by Catherine Dean to strengthen the response was rejected by the council.  Despite reminders to the Council that paragraph 6(9) of the Draft PPS referred specifically to Elsenham and that Saffron Walden Conservatives had issued a communiqué earlier in the week quoting senior Conservatives' opposition to eco-towns and the Local Development Framework, (LDF), Councillor Barker proposed that the Council adopt Option Response One (with a brief amended mention of NE Elsenham) be adopted.  Seconded by Councillor Cheetham, the Conservative members present voted unanimously in favour and this much weakened response was carried. 

Where does that leave us and what will the DCLG make of Uttlesford's response? -  only time will tell when they publish their short list.  Remember, the NE Elsenham nomination as an eco-town came directly out of Option 4 of the Core Strategy which still underpins that nomination.  I will leave you to mull that over - BB

horizontal rule

Minutes of the last UDC Environment Committee meeting (see below) now available for viewing - Click here

horizontal rule

BARD LAUNCHES ECO-TOWN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPEAL

The BARD Campaign today (18th March) lodged an application with the Court of Appeal, seeking permission to appeal the ruling by Mr Justice Walker dated 27 January 2009 that the Government’s consultation on its April 2008 shortlist document: “Eco-towns Living a Greener Future” was lawful.

horizontal rule

Environment Meeting - Tuesday 17th March 2009

Hi All,

 

Firstly thank you if you managed to attend last night's U.D.C Environment Committee meeting. The purpose of this meeting was to approve the U.D.C response to the DCLG consultation. The J.P.C.S.G were very keen to ensure that U.D.C responded very strongly against the eco-town at Elsenham. The draft response prepared by the Planning Officers for approval was anything but strong, and having read it several times I was not sure whether U.D.C were for, or against, the eco town!

 

Petrina Lees from J.P.C.S.G kick started the meeting by asking the Committee how they intended to respond given that last year they had past a motion vigorously condemning the eco-town and agreeing to campaign against it. We then moved on to the debate on the response and Catherine Dean proposed a motion that reiterated the very strong U.D.C opposition to the eco-town and called for more work on the paper that would then  be debated by  the  full Council on 21st April.

 

I'm afraid that at this point the meeting descended into farce with political mudslinging between the Conservatives and the Lib Dems. The leader of the Council Jim Ketteridge, read a long prepared statement which outlined the past history of the housing situation blaming much of the current position on the Lib Dems. This was all very unhelpful given that the agenda item was to discuss the Councils response to the DCLG consultation. In the end Cllr. Dean's proposal was passed and we hope to see a much stronger response put forward to full Council on the 21st.

 

Please make a note in your diaries for this date.

 

I must say the evening was not without a little humour. When Cllr Barker called for a vote on Cllr Dean's motion many of the Conservatives were not sure which way to vote, and looked like rabbits caught in the headlights.

 

I am pleased that yet again we turned out in numbers and I think influenced another look at the consultation response.

 

Nick Baker Chairman of J.P.C.S.G

horizontal rule

Environment Meeting - Tuesday 17th March - 7.30pm at the Council Chambers, London Road, Saffron Walden

Minutes Now available - Click here

Once again the people of Elsenham and Henham turned out in a good numbers to hear the U.D.C. Environment Committee discuss the proposed Eco-town at North-east Elsenham.  On behalf of the Joint Parishes Council Steering Group I thank you for your continuing support - BB

Item 7 on the meeting agenda was:-

Response to the Government’s consultation on its draft Eco-Towns Planning Policy Statement

Item for decision:-

Further to the Committee’s resolution of 18 November 2008, this report will recommend further points for incorporation in the Council’s response, including those arising on the additional Viability Assessment material published on 5 March.  (para 3.8 deals specifically to Elsenham) A Briefing Note to members of the committee from Melanie Jones, the Chief Planning Officer for U.D.C can be viewed by clicking here.

Please see above for a review of the meeting by Nick Baker, Chairman of the J.P.C.S.G

horizontal rule

Click Here to go to the SOV DCLG Consultation Page Anthem for Green England

Communities Against Ford Eco-ton (CAFE)

Click here to visit the site for a download
 

 

 

Dear all

Well, we are nearly at the end of another consultation and I have to thank all those who helped organise the response, and of course those who replied. We feel that our consultants reports drew out the main issues very well, and our responses will reflect not only our strong feelings against this development, but also articulate the reasons why we object in a very clear manner.

I say at the end of another consultation because at the last minute the Government decided to extent the deadline for replies until the 30th April. This cavalier approach to dates is extremely unhelpful, and doesn't take into account the enormous amount of work that goes into responding to a consultation like this. To tell us one week before the end of the consultation that we have another two months to reply is frankly disgraceful. We want an end to this ridiculous eco-town proposition and to continually move dates backwards bears no thought for people who are blighted whilst this process creaks onwards.

On a brighter note, Essex County Council has lodged a strong ‘no’ to the eco-town at Elsenham. I heard today (4th) that Bishops Stortford Town Council have also lodged strong objections. We have not heard the Uttlesford response, but we are pressing them to make their eco-town objections known to Government and to publish their paper so we can all see what they say.

So, what's next?  Well, the Government, at the end of this consultation, will publish a short list of possible eco-town sites which will go forward to the next stage which will bring them into the planning processes. I hope that our strong objections, together with any independent Government appraisal of Fairfield’s plans, will mean that we are not on this short list.

Nick Baker - Chairman J.P.C.S.G

 

horizontal rule

Extension to Deadline for DCLG Consultation

Dear all

Please see blow a copy of the email from the DCLG regarding their decision to extend the deadline for submissions to their consultation until 30th April 2009.

On behalf of the Joint Parishes Steering Group I would like to extend our heartfelt thanks and appreciation to all who have submitted responses thus far.  Don Sturgeon will be making a special trip to the DCLG offices this week with sizable and ever growing bundle of your letters.  A special thanks must also go to our canvassers who have been working tirelessly over the past two weeks to deliver the packs to the villagers of Elsenham and Henham and to collect your responses.  A great effort by all. 

May I also say a further special thanks to our neighbouring village of Widdington from whom we had over seventy submissions of support.

For those of you who have not yet managed to respond you have now have more time to do so. 

I am sorry for those who, whilst in the process of filling in the DCLG on-line form, found that their system crashed on them, sometimes at the very point of submitting the form.  Very frustrating.

Yours

Bill Bates

Copy of email from DCLG

Thank you for your submission to the first stage of eco-towns consultation.

Following the release of the full written judgment of recent legal proceedings, the consultation on the draft Planning Policy Statement (PPS) and Sustainability Appraisal on eco-towns has now been extended to Thursday 30 April.

We would be very grateful if you could alert any relevant members of your organisation to this deadline extension and look forward to receiving any submissions by this date.

Copies of the relevant documents are available from:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing/housingsupply/ecotowns/

Paper copies can be ordered by calling: 0300 123 1124

The official consultation form can be found at:
http://ecotownssurvey.communities.gov.uk/home/

 Submissions can be made to:

ecotowns@communities.gsi.gov.uk
 
Eco-towns Team, 2/H9, Eland House, Bressenden Place, Victoria, London SW1E 5DU 

We also plan to publish a financial viability study on prospective eco-town locations (prepared by external advisers for CLG) next week which people may want to draw on when submitting their consultation responses.

You can keep up to date with eco-town news by signing up for the e-newsletter, follow the process here: http://haveyoursay.communities.gov.uk/newsletters/default.aspx

Kind regards,

The eco-towns team

horizontal rule

Tuesday 10th February - North Hall Road

In common with other parts of Essex, on Tuesday 10th February, following a thaw and further rain, we awoke to find our roads flooded.  Jonathan Leach ventured out with his camera and took a number of pictures of North Hall Road which most Elsenham and Henham folk use to travel north to Saffron Walden and beyond, e.g. Cambridge. and which the residents from the proposed eco-town would also have to use.

Click here to view some of his pictures
 

North Hall Road at the Widdington turn off
Additionally, back in July Jonathan wrote an article for this web site about the inevitable problems that would be caused by heavy rain.  Click here to visit it again.  Similar pictures?

horizontal rule

VILLAGE MEETING LAUNCHES OUR RESPONSE TO D.C.L.G. CONSULTATION
Sue Mott, Nick Baker and Simon Lee Sue Mott, sports Journalist and nine year Henham resident opened the meeting at Henham Village Hall on Wednesday 11th February.  Addressing a very good turnout, Sue spoke passionately about her village and the 'vandalism in the name of progress' that was being imposed on Henham and Elsenham.  She likened our campaign to a marathon that the Government had thrown at us and urged every resident to respond yet again to another consultation.
Following an outline of our current situation by Don Sturgeon, Simon Lee, a fellow Henham Parish Councillor, explained that every household in Henham and Elsenham would be receiving an information pack over the weekend giving details about the latest consultation and how to best respond. 

Please click here to go to the consultation page which gives all the information. It is essential than you make your feelings known.

There will be a further similar meeting at Elsenham on Friday 13th at 8.00pm in the Village Hall.  Please attend and show your continuing support.

horizontal rule

Look East on Eco-towns

See a repeat of BBC Look East report (Monday 10th) on Marston Vale in Bedfordshire and an Eco-town in Sweden built on a brown-field site
Click Here

Eco-towns are also a subject in the Politics Show at 12 noon BBC 1 this coming Sunday

horizontal rule

An Important Week in Our Campaign.
(See consultation page - click here)

 

You may have see that another eco-town has been 'pulled up' by the developer in the Grand National Eco-Town Stakes, viz. Marston Vale, in Bedfordshire. That was a 20,000 homes development and no doubt very good news for them but perhaps not so good for us. We need to keep the pressure on.

In a letter to Nick Baker dated 6th February, Sir Alan Haselhurst M.P told us that he had what he believed to be a 'useful meeting' with Margaret Beckett concerning the proposed eco-town at Elsenham. He said,

"I placed particular emphasis on the necessary supportive transport infrastructure, but I was also able to draw on your consultants' report.   I also took the opportunity to stress the general unsuitability of a District such as Uttlesford to accommodate the total number of houses which now seem to be in the pipeline under one heading or another. Apart from the extra homes for which planning provision has already been made before the LDF target was increased, I told her that Uttlesford's housing needs would be better catered for by low cost social housing additions such as we have already seen in many of our villages."

The Minister reiterated that she was not committed to any set number of eco-towns and those which are allowed to go forward would have to meet the most exacting standards.

horizontal rule

Middle Quinton Judicial Review

You may have read in the paper that one of the eco town sites lost a judicial review in the High Court on Tuesday.  Be assured that we have been monitoring this situation closely. Although the decision was a disappointment it was about the process of the initial consultations by the Government on eco towns, and not about the locations etc.  If the decision had been the other way it would have meant that the Government would have had to start the consultation all over again leading to major delays in any decisions.  I don't think it has too much impact on our campaign which is all about Elsenham being a wrong development in the wrong place.'

Nick Baker, Chairman J.P.C.S.G

horizontal rule

Item of Considerable Interest
Please see the Blackboard Page for responses to a letter written to Fairfield following their presentations last October

horizontal rule

Progress Report on the Grand National Eco-Town Stakes

It struck me the other day that our campaign can be likened to a steeplechase devised on similar lines to that which might appear in a sequel to Alice in Wonderland, namely, The Grand National Eco-town Stakes. Our horse, called North-East Elsenham, is owned by the Fairfield Partnership.  It was sired by a horse bred by David Lock Associates out of a mare of suspect pedigree called Option 4, (owned by Uttlesford District Council).  This race is of indeterminate length and nobody is quite sure where the finishing line is.  Fences keep being erected as the race goes on and our money is firmly on North-East Elsenham not being placed or hopefully falling well before the end.

Over the last year, particularly in the early stages of the race we saw a Foinavon type of incident (Grand National 1967) when many horses fell at the same fence.  The race continued and three more horses, notably one called Hanley Grange, were pulled up by their jockeys.  There are now 12 runners left.  Currently, the owners of one of the horses, Middle Quinton, has called for a Stewards Enquiry, (known in this race as a Judicial Review), which if successful may result in the race being stopped and either abandoned or started again.  We cannot rely on this however. (latest see above)

We are approaching a crucial stage in the race in March when the race organisers, the Department of Communities and Local Government, sponsored by Gordon Brown and  Associates, will themselves make a judgement on the names of horses to continue.  We are not sure how many they will decide on but bad weather, (economic climate change), has made the going decidedly heavy.

It is therefore very important that we keep up the pressure on the D.C.L.G. to convince them that North East Elsenham is totally unfit to continue.  On 4th November 2008 they issued yet another version of the set of rules regarding fitness of horses for the latter stages of the race called the Draft Planning Policy Statement - Eco-towns Consultation, abbreviated as  'PPS' which you can see by clicking here. This report contains a number of questions about the concept of the The Grand National Eco-town Stakes and about the condition of the remaining horses.  They have given 'the connections' until 6th March 2009 to respond to their questions.  Yes, you've got it, they call it a 'public consultation', a term we have heard before somewhere. 

We, the punters, who have placed a considerable amount on North East Elsenham to lose, have commissioned two reports from independent vets called Hives Planning and Stuart Michael Associates.  These reports categorically say that our horse is unfit to continue and should really not have started in the first place. In a nutshell they say:-

bullet

Transport: The road system to serve a 5,000 dwelling, 11,000 population Eco-town is wholly inadequate. Traffic would pass through the already congested small town of Stansted Mountfitchet or along unclassified country lanes.

bullet

Employment: The settlement is too small to provide adequate employment facilities for its population. This would result in an unacceptable degree of out-commuting

bullet

Education: The provision of a secondary school is widely seen as a key indicator of a new sustainable (eco-town) settlement. The proposed town is not big enough to support such an institution leaving pupils to travel elsewhere.

bullet

Services: The settlement is too small to support adequate services such as convenience shopping, leaving residents to travel elsewhere.

bullet

Regeneration: This is not a brownfield site as originally envisaged by the eco-towns initiative. It is a greenfield site, the ‘best and most versatile’ agricultural land.

bullet

Conflict of interest: there is concern over the fairness and potential conflict of interest in the process where advisers seem to have been consulting for the Government and the North East Elsenham development promoter.

At this stage in the race we are going to ask for your help once more.  With the aid of the vets reports we are going to ask you to give the D.C.L.G your views as before.  Currently we are preparing information packs for each household in Elsenham and Henham which will explain in detail what we are going to ask you to do.  Additionally, as before, we are going to hold public meetings in both villages, probably in the second week in February. (see above).

The J.P.C.S.G is keenly aware that you may be suffering from 'consultation overload' but we see no other way.  The race organisers set the rules but we cannot ignore them and hope they will go away.

We have decided to make the vets reports public and are in the process of giving Uttlesford District Council (the owners of Option 4) a copy to assist them when making their response to the D.C.L.G.  To view them please click on the respective names, i.e. Hives Planning and Stuart Michael Associates

Please remember these reports are subject to copyright.

What a silly race this is!

BB

horizontal rule

The  Uttlesford District Council Environment Committee Meeting

 Held at 7.30pm on Tuesday 20th January 2009 at the Council Chambers.

Prior to the meeting, Nick Baker the Chairman of the J.P.C.S.G was given leave to address the Councillors.  A full transcript can be seen by clicking here

He explained that whilst the relationship between the J.P.C.S.G and the Environment Committee had never been close, we were willing to share the contents of the two independent reports commissioned by the campaign against the proposed Eco-town. 

He stated that the reports confirmed that the governments proposal for an Eco-town in north east Elsenham was fundamentally flawed.  He urged the Committee to consider the reports when replying to the current D.C.L.G consultation which ends on 6th March.

The meeting commenced and Item 7 on the Agenda was:-Local Development Scheme - Item for decision, viz-

"This report recommends a revised programme for the preparation of the Local Development Framework, and that the Committee recommends the Scheme to the Full Council".
(It has some 21 pages and can be viewed by
clicking here.) 

Roger Harborough outlined new timetables for the LDS (Local Development Scheme). The presentation was confusing and few members of the public, if any, left the meeting with a clear comprehension of exactly what was happening.

It seems that the Stansted Airport G2 enquiry has some bearing on the timetable as the housing and road infrastructure requires an understanding of whether we are to get a second runway. Additionally, the various technical studies are still awaited and these will determine whether development plans are sound.

So where does that leave us. It seems that in September 2009 there will be further public consultation on options for Stansted Airport and housing distribution. In April 2010 the Core Strategy will be published. From November 2010 there will be public examination of the Core Strategy leading to Adoption in October 2011. Meanwhile, running alongside the Core Strategy are the Development Control Policies which involve public participation on preferred options for specific development sites. This starts in 2011 and finalises in 2013.
It appears that we have considerable slippage in the timetable. The Stansted enquiry may not start until September 2009 and is likely to last 20 months. This could disrupt the timetable further. Meanwhile other housing plans are emerging including a 20,000 'New Town' in the Little Canfield area. What this all means is we have a long campaign which will constantly change as new plans are submitted.

In response to a question from Councillor David Morson, Mr Harborough reported that a final decision on whether Option 4 would go ahead or be abandoned would be taken in May 2010 following new reports on site location, drainage and transport. Cllr. Morson asked for clarification on what would be the criteria for coming to this decision, given that a Preferred Option had already been identified in September 2007. Was it going to be the case that the results of the new, subsequent surveys would either vindicate or remove this choice which has already been made?  Mr.Harborough's response was that this would partly be the case. When Cllr Morson further asked what then would be the other components of the decision, Mr. Harborough replied the ‘consultations which have already been done’.

BB

horizontal rule

The Independent  of 12th Jan says -

"Fierce opposition forces Brown to shorten eco-towns shortlist"

click here to view

Sunday Telegraph of 3rd January says -

Government eco-town proposals receive fresh blow

"The Government's flagship eco-town strategy has suffered another damaging blow after an independent report said one of the proposed towns was "unworkable".

Click here to view

horizontal rule

The South Uttlesford Community Forum met on Thursday 8 January 2009,7.30 pm. at Mountfitchet Mathematics and Computing College, Forest Hall Road, Stansted Mountfitchet.   Cllr David Morson has written a brief report concerning the LDF, Elsenham Pharmacy and this year's Community Charge

Click here to view

horizontal rule

Elsenham/Henham Boxing Day Walk
(Apologies - I got these pictures some days ago and forgot to put them on - BB)

horizontal rule

Henham Dads Christmas Disco in aid of the Save Our Village Fund.

I am pleased to announce that the Disco at the Village Hall on 20th December raised a princely £500 to boost the funds of the Save Our Village campaign.  Steve Inkley said, "The highlight of the evening was a Disco dancing competition between six Henham Dads that was comfortably won by Scott Robertson. Give the man a white suit and he will be available for the remake of Saturday night Fever."

Nick Baker, chairman of the Joint Parish Council Steering Group said, "On behalf of the J.P.C.S.G our thanks go to the organisers and all who attended.  It is a magnificent sum that will be well used in our campaign."

Click here to read more

horizontal rule

The following email has a been received on Tuesday 24th December from ECOTOWNS@communities.gsi.gov.uk regarding the Eco-town Programme -

 

Thank you for your submission to the first stage of eco-towns consultation.

You may or may not be aware that a judicial review has been granted to opponents of the Middle Quinton scheme near Stratford and that the Court has now listed this for hearing on 22 and 23 January 2009. In line with commitments which she has made to the claimants and to other interested parties in the case, the Secretary of State has decided to extend the deadline for responses on the draft Planning Policy Statement and the accompanying Sustainability Appraisal on Eco-Towns from 19th February 2009 to 6th March 2009. This effectively allows an additional two weeks for people to respond to the current round of consultation.
We would be very grateful if you could alert any relevant members of your organisation to this deadline extension and look forward to receiving any submissions by this date.

Copies of the relevant documents are available from:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing/housingsupply/ecotowns/

The official consultation form can be found at:
http://ecotownssurvey.communities.gov.uk/home/

Submissions can be made to:

ecotowns@communities.gsi.gov.uk
Eco-towns Team 2/H9 Eland House Bressenden Place Victoria London SW1E 5DU

Kind regards and best wishes for the Christmas period,

The eco-towns team

 

 
Christmas Message from Nick Baker - Chairman of the Joint Parish Council Steering Group.

Click here to read

horizontal rule

Letter from the Rt. Hon Margaret Becket, Minister for Housing and Planning
Back on 1st September 2008 Lembit Opik MP, the then Lib Dem Shadow Housing Minister came to a meeting of the Joint Parish Council Steering Group and promised to right on our behalf to the then Housing Minister Caroline Flint regarding the notion of disbursing housing needs through Uttlesford, (named Option 5). This he did but, in the meantime, Ms. Flint was superseded by the Rt. Hon, Margaret Becket MP, who has subsequently replied in her capacity as Housing Minister. Mr. Opik has forwarded a copy of the letter to Cllr. Catherine Dean and it contains some significant statements, particularly in the third paragraph.  To view a copy of the letter in picture form, please click here. (You may have to enlarge it to read it properly)

horizontal rule

Interesting Article on Eco-towns from the trade magazine Property Week
click here to view

horizontal rule

U.D.C. Environment Committee - Tuesday 18th November 2008  - Complaints
(see below)

Since this meeting, many complaints have been received about the manner in which it was conducted.  A selection of these have been placed on The Blackboard on this site.  These and more have been sent to Mr. John Mitchell, the C.E.O. of the U.D.C. Mr. Mitchell has responded with an investigation and adjudication on the matter.  This can be viewed by clicking here.  For those who attended the meeting, I leave you to draw your own conclusions and will no doubt be hearing from you. - BB

horizontal rule

From Nick Baker - Chairman of the Joint Parishes Steering Group

Dear All

As I said in my last message things are really moving on a pace at present. On the positive side Sir Alan Hazlehurst and the Shadow Housing Minister have stated their position to the developers, that should a Conservative Government be elected they would withdraw all support for an eco-town at NE Elsenham. In addition Eric Pickles another Shadow Minister has stated that he would disband the East of England planning authority and return the decisions on local development to local democracy.

On the negative side we were all disappointed at the Environment Committee meeting held at Uttlesford on the 18th Nov. About 100 supporters attended and most, like me, left the meeting in total confusion. Were Uttlesford now in favour of an eco-town at NE Elsenham? It now seems not, but it was very confusing on the night. It seems an easy task to Chair a public meeting in a courteous, efficient, and effective manner, but this seems beyond this particular committee. I sometimes think that U.D.C. Councillors forget that many supporters of S.O.V. campaign have held high office in public and private life, and find some of these meetings astonishing in their lack of direction and appalling meandering debates. I sat next to a very successful business man who said to me, 'If you ran a company like this you'd be bankrupt in days'. Some residents have written to Uttlesford expressing their disappointment and copies of these letters can be found on this website. J.P.C.S.G members have had useful meetings with the D.C.L.G representatives and feel that our concerns are in part shared by Government. We will continue to analyse and articulate these concerns using independent experts.

Well at the meeting of the J.P.C.S.G last night we were faced with how to react to the second consultation on the eco-town by the D.C.L.G. This finishes on the 19th February 2009. Again we will ask you to put pen to paper, but not until the New Year. We have commissioned a number of technical reports from experts in their fields. These reports will not be available until around Christmas, so we will be canvassing you in January with the findings of these reports. We will provide a shortened version where you can select the issues that concern you the most. You will remember that last year the Environment Committee forced us into a Christmas and New Year consultation period, at least this year we will do it after the festive season.

I wish all our supporters a very happy Christmas and New Year. I think we are winning the debate over this ridiculous development proposition and we are winning with sensible, well thought through arguments. This next stage will reinforce these arguments and hopefully we will win the day. It must be true that the rejection of an eco-town by the D.C.L.G would knock on to the 'Option 4' proposals. Infrastructure arguments will be the same for 3000 houses as 5000.

Nick Baker

How did we get in this mess?

Please take time to read the Communities and Local Government Department's Eco-towns Sustainability Appraisal for North East Elsenham, a document prepared by Scott Wilson Ltd.  It is a long-winded title, but the report is relatively easy to digest and in my opinion worth printing off if you can, (45 pages).   Download it by clicking here. Draw your own conclusions on the responsibility that must be shouldered by the U.D.C. in relation to their preferred option 4.

horizontal rule

Uttlesford District Council Environment Committee Meeting
Tuesday 18th November at 7.30pm. (
Agenda)

(Read what the Herts and Essex Observer said click here for page one and here for page two) -

Villagers from Elsenham and Henham were once again out in force to attend yet another meeting of the Environment Committee.  On behalf of the Joint Parish Council Steering Group may I thank all who attended only to come away again with mixed feelings of anger, confusion, disbelief, puzzlement, sadness and above all frustration.  As we left the Council Chamber one resident said, "and how are you going to sum that lot up for the web site." How indeed, well here goes!

Cllr. David Morson, District started the proceedings with a question once again relating to how the preferred option 4, on which the subsequent Eco-town proposal was based could have been introduced last year without prior technical studies.  Once again Cllr. Barker failed to give a convincing reason stating that a preferred option had to be put forward and that it was a 'chicken and egg' situation and Roger Harborough stating that the Consultation had raised many issues which necessitated further studies.

Two local speakers then addressed the meeting.

The first was Mrs. Gail Phillips who introduced herself as a school teacher from Old Mead Lane and area surrounded by beautiful countryside.  She spoke scathingly on the way that Fairfield had conducted their presentations.  She criticized the lack of detail, especially in relation to where the proposed houses would be placed, (shown as green on the map), the lack of opportunity to study the various display panels.  Click here to view her speech. At the conclusion Cllr. Barker stated she also had not been impressed by Fairfield's efforts.

Mrs. Sheena Bigland from Henham then gave a passionate speech in defence of our countryside and I will not attempt to précis it. Please click here for the full text which I urge you to read.

Items 7 and 8 on the agenda were of importance to our campaign.

bullet

Item 7  - Eco-Towns Consultation. Click here to see the council papers. This report recommends how the Council should respond to the next stage of the Government Consultation on Eco -Towns. The Council claims it has achieved a victory by removing the enforcement of Eco Towns centrally by incorporating them into the Local Development Framework Core Strategy. However, as pointed out by Cllrs. Morson and C. Dean this will also cause a contradictory problem for the Administration if it continues to support Option 4.
The council voted in favour of the recommendations contained in the report.
 

bullet

Item Progress with the L.D.F. Core Strategy. Click here to see the council papers for this item. The long awaited report which summarised the key issues arising from the representations received on the Core Strategy Preferred Options Consultation, (Click here to view) It was received by the committee and in my opinion almost glossed over. 
Cllr Morson comments, "These long awaited Consultation results were full of criticisms of lack of evidence and sound judgement for the process so far." When he questioned the actual status of Option 4,  Cllr. Barker stated she could not answer as all the studies were in the hands of the Officers and she would be guided by their judgement.

During this item, the frustration from the residents present increased more and more, fuelled by the perceived evasive attitude of the committee members. 

Cllr Morson, said, "How can the Council publicly oppose the Eco Town Proposal for Elsenham and use planning arguments against it, when these same arguments could be levelled against their own Preferred Option 4 at Elsenham."

A number of referrals were made to the Chief Planning Officer, Roger Harborough and the answers received left me more than confused. It would appear that the council will not be in a position to make any sort of decision until well into 2009.  The schedule for receiving the technical studies was very vague and Mr Harborough intimated that these studies would also have to be consulted on.

As a result of Stage 2 of the Department of Communities and Local Government Eco-town Consultation which runs from 4th November until 19th February 2009 we are going to ask you for your involvement. We intend to place all the relevant documents in the hands of our planning adviser and will be reporting back to you at the earliest opportunity on the way forward and how we as a community can best tackle this stage of the campaign.  In the meantime if you attended the meeting and wish to comment, particularly on anything I have missed, please send then to me via saveourvillage@live.co.uk for posting on The Blackboard.

horizontal rule

Quiz Night Saturday 8th November at Elsenham Village Hall
Raised a brilliant £908.  Well done to Jennifer, her mum Ruth, Andre and Petrina Lees and of course to all of you who attended'

Additionally, we have some quiz sheets at a cost of £1 each for a first prize of £50. Purchase from – Jennifer Jarvis, 24 Broom Farm Road, Elsenham (814434) or from Henham village shop, TJ Poppins, Barkers Garage, Post Office

horizontal rule

Department of Communities and Local Government Road Shows and Stage two Consultation
Presentation van in Bishops Stortford Monday 10th November from 0900 -1900  in the Market Square, Bishops Stortford
and
Tuesday 11th November at Saffron Walden Market 1000 - 1700.
On Monday 10th November I visited the trailer in Bishops Stortford.  It was staffed by very helpful young people although the amount of information inside was decidedly uninspiring.  Unfortunately, owing to the very heavy rain the roof was leaking like a sieve and the analogy did strike me that the whole Eco-town programme, whilst looking quite attractive on superficial perusal, actually also leaked like a sieve when tested to any degree.

From what was on display, shoppers from Bishops Stortford will have no idea of the negative impact that the proposed eco-town will have on them and the surrounding area.  Indeed, the purpose of the road show was not to go into detail on individual projects and the young lady I spoke to had not visited the Elsenham site.

These road shows are part of the D.C.L.G  second stage of consultation which started on 4th November and will continue until 19th February 09.  They seek views on the following publications:-

  1. Draft Planning Policy Statement: Eco-towns -  Consultation

  2. Eco-towns: Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Draft Eco-towns Planning Policy Statement

  3. Impact Assessment - Planning Policy Statement (PPS): Eco-towns - Consultation

  4. Eco-towns: living a greener future - Summary of consultation responses

Please take time to read the above if you can.  The Joint Parish Council Steering Group will be doing the same and seeking the advice of our experts.  We will report back as soon a possible.
 

In relation to 2. above -

Click on the picture to go straight to the Sustainability Appraisal on Elsenham

Click here to view the publication
   
In relation to 4. above -

Many of you may have received the e-mail from the Department of Communities and Local Government  regarding the views received by them by 30th June 08 on their document 'Living for a Greener Future'. The summary can be viewed by clicking on the picture.  Particularly have a look at Section 1 page nine.  This shows a graph of responses and Elsenham features highly due to the letters you sent in early this year. On page 47 is a summary of the specific issues raised in relation to Elsenham which I have also copied to a Word document which you may view by clicking here.

horizontal rule

Eco Towns - Shelter and the D.C.L.G. - BBC4 'You and Yours'
If you did not hear it at the time, there was a very interesting discussion on BBC 4 'You and Yours' on Thursday 6th November regarding Eco-towns and the government funding of Shelter leaflets - Click here to go to the page relevant page, scroll down and you will see the Eco-town item.

horizontal rule

We are on the Short-List
"Local communities will get their next chance to have their say on the eco-town proposals as Housing Minister Margaret Beckett today (4th November) launches the Government's second round of formal consultation on the proposed locations and standards for eco-towns."
 Click here to read the Department of Communities and Local Government's announcement on the beginning of Phase Two in which Elsenham is given a grade B listing and here to see what BBC Look East had to report.
 
The Panel at the Elsenham Meeting Also on Tuesday 4th November the Joint Parish Council Steering Group held two Public Meetings at Henham and Elsenham.  There was a good audience at both venues.

Amongst the speakers was Kate Ward of the Saffron Walden Friends of the Earth who gave their unqualified support to our campaign.  Please click here to view what she said.

 
I attended the Elsenham meeting chaired by Stewart Pimblett.  Journalist and Henham resident Jason Barlow was first to speak and he outlined what we had gone through over the last year.  He stated that there there were clear and compelling arguments why Elsenham was totally the wrong place for an eco-town, and he was particularly scathing about Option 4, but emphasized that we were not against affordable housing or indeed the concept of eco-towns. (a full report of his speech will be available soon).

Simon Lee spoke next and stated that we had a long haul in front of us and that we needed substantial funds if we were to get the best advice from our legal and technical advisors.  He stressed the need for community involvement in fund raising and other aspects of the campaign.  The Working Party and the Joint Parishes Steering Group could not do it all and needed to concentrate on convincing government that the Elsenham option was totally flawed.

Don Sturgeon then spoke about the way that our campaign had been conducted over the past year and summarised the many meetings we had had with ministers, MP's, Government officials, etc.  He also talked about the invaluable advice we had received from our retained experts and the support of Essex County Council.  He stated that he and Petrina were meeting again with Henry Cleary of the DCLG.  He talked about the forthcoming presentations at Bishops Stortford and Saffron Walden (see below) and stressed that as many people as possible should attend and give their constructive views.  He said that Bishop Stortford and Stansted residents  were yet to fully understand the impact that an eco-town at Elsenham would have on them. 

Last but by no means least Petrina Lees passionately appealed for more help in the campaign, fundraising and to keep writing to Ministers, Mp's Government Departments, Essex County Council and Uttlesford District Council. - BB 

horizontal rule

What the Papers Say 
bullet
Only two of the 10 sites originally promised by Gordon Brown are now expected to be built

Click here to view the article in The Observer 26th October

horizontal rule

Fairfield Presentation/Consultation - Questionnaire

Further to the article below, Margaret Shaw has managed to get a 'Word' copy of that notorious questionnaire they were encouraging us to fill in.  click here to view. - BB

horizontal rule

Two new Press Releases from The Joint Parish Council Steering Group - 22nd Oct
Release One - Release Two

horizontal rule

The Fairfield Presentation/Consultation
Click on link to view a Press Release by the Joint Parish Council Steering Group
Cllr. David Morson's view
 
Presentation at Henham Village Hall
Henham Village Hall
 
Having already given presentations at Saffron Walden, Great Dunmow and the Hilton Hotel, Fairfield arrived at Henham and Elsenham on Tuesday 14th October 2008.  Their display consisted of three panels showing information about their project.

Should you wish to do so they have supplied PDF downloads of each, viz.
Panel 1 - Panel 2 - Panel 3

Further downloads of many of their documents can be obtained by going to their site - click here should you wish to do so.

I attended the Henham Presentation and I tried initially to put myself in the position of someone living outside the affected area.  Superficially, (and this is how it must also appear to Ministers, M.P.'s, Government Departments, etc.) the idea of an Eco Market Town must be appealing.  The presenters were very pleasant and rehearsed in their explanations of the information on display.

In spite of the fact that the Henham presentation was only between 11.00am and 4.00pm (when they had the hall booked from 9.00am and 6.00pm and they could have hired it for much longer should they have so wished) it was very well attended by those residents who were available during the day time.

It was only when I started to listen to the responses to specific and penetrating questions that it quickly became apparent how little substance there was to the various topics raised.  In fact, considering the time Fairfield and their associates have have had to develop this scheme it was appalling.  Time and time again the presenters were unable to give satisfactory explanations on major and fundamental issues and the mood in the hall was of incredulous disbelief and seething anger.  I am led to believe that the same occurred at Elsenham presentation later in the evening.  A 'total farce' was an opinion widely held.

In spite of this Fairfield seem confident that they will win the day and that a development of either 3000 houses (option 4) or the bigger eco-town project will be successful.  I wonder where they get their confidence from.  What is it we don't know?

The bottom line remains that Uttlesford District Council hold the key. 

Fairfield say they are in the process of 'Consulting,' (a word I have grown to hate over the last year), so see the comments form at the back of the flyer you received through your door entitled 'Your Views Count'.  However, we are unaware how your comments are to be evaluated.

Fairfild's flyer - click here to go to their site

Please fill this in carefully with your views and send it off to them. There is also a feedback form on their websiteAdditionally, you may have picked up a Consultation Questionnaire at one of the presentations.  Before filling this in please read it very carefully. I feel this is is 'loaded/biased' and has an overriding assumption that the reader is in favour of either option 4 or the eco-town.

One of the presenters stated that Fairfield will answer questions about the project if you write to them.  Personally I wouldn't hold my breath on that one. Click here for the Freepost address which you can print off, viz. Ron Gibbons, David Lock Associates, Elsenham Consultation, 7 Bayley Street, London WC1 3HB.

Yet again you might find you wish to send an email to our new Housing Minister, the Rt. Hon. Margaret Becket MP via margaret.beckett@communities.gsi.gov.uk 

If you have any comments you wish to make I am thinking of starting a 'blackboard' of such views.  Please send then to me via saveourvillage@live.co.uk

In the meantime I have already received a very good letter which Jonathan Leech, a regular contributor to this site has sent off to the Consultation, (Click here to view) and one from Trevor Ellis-Callow sent to Henry Cleary of the Dept. of Communities and Local Government. (Click here to view)

BB

horizontal rule

Latest Odd bits
 
bullet3rd October - Cabinet reshuffle -  Rt. Hon Margaret Beckett, MP for Derby South and former Foreign Secretary, has replaced Caroline Flint.  (third housing minister in a year) - Find out a little about her  click here
bullet SHELTER the Housing and Homeless Charity have formed what they call a 'Coalition' and have issued a Press Release last week.
We attach a copy of it and our press release in response at
ShelterCoalition and  Save Our Villages.  Please click on the respective link to read and draw your own conclusions.

horizontal rule

 
 
What the Papers Said
Eco-town Protesters Hit out at Labour - See Don Sturgeon's comments in the Herts and Essex
click here
County Councillor Ray Gooding wrote a very interesting letter to the Herts and Essex Observer this week (25th Sept) - See 'This is Social Engineering'
 
ECO-TOWN: BARD WINS PLEA FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT POLICY
CAMPAIGNERS against the proposed 6,000-home eco-town at Long Marston are celebrating the news that the government’s policy on the scheme will have to be defended before the High Court in a judicial review.
Click here to view an article in the Stratford Herald

Sir Alan Haselhurst
MP for Saffron Walden gives his latest views

"Campaign against Hellsenham must move up a gear"

Click here to view the article in this week's Herts and Essex

Homlessness charity Shelter is under fire for using £100,000 of Government money to publish eco-town propaganda

See the article in the Herts and Essex Observer

The Sunday Telegraph of 8th September 2008 reports –

 ‘A housing Charity has admitted that it was paid £100,000 by the government to produce a series of 13 information leaflets setting out the case for Gordon Brown's controversial eco-towns scheme
Called Eco-town - the facts, the 20 page leaflets are branded with the Shelter logo and focus largely on the need for more affordable housing, with only one paragraph addressing such concerns as traffic levels, flood risks and pressure on public services'
  How fair is that!  Very strange - Should such a charity be sponsored for Government purposes such as this?

Eco-Towns - A design for Life

See what The Times - 5th August has to say - click here

horizontal rule

Eco-towns set to face toughest ever green standards, plus-

I quote - from the DCLG web site
"Following changes made to the shortlisted schemes announced in April, including two new proposals for an eco-town in Rushcliffe and major changes made to the proposal at Rossington, a formal consultation on both these draft standards and a detailed sustainability appraisal of each location will now be published in September. A final decision on up to ten potential locations will be made in early 2009, after which the individual schemes will each have to submit planning applications."

Click here to view the article on the Department of Communities and Local Government Website

Where does this leave Uttlesford District Council and their decision about the Local Government Framework and Option 4 in particular? 

Nick Baker says

"The J.P.C.S.G. are convinced that the U.D.C. consultation should be brought to a conclusion as soon as possible.  We know that U.D.C. will publish the results of the consultation for discussion at the Environment Committee on the 16th September 2008.  We are also aware that the consultation shows overwhelming opposition to Option 4, as well as considerable opposition to Options 2 and 3. The J.P.C.S.G. strongly believe that the adoption of Option 4 as the 'preferred option' by U.D.C, led to the 'Developer led' proposal for an Eco-town on the same site. Without Option 4 being the 'preferred option’ in the consultation I doubt the proposed Eco-town would have been considered. We do understand that the consultation should run it's course to stand up to scrutiny, but given that we were forced to hold it over Christmas and the New Year because of the extreme urgency, it seems ironic that we are now in August without further advancement.

 U.D.C. continue to deny the link between Option 4 and the Eco-town I cannot understand this thinking and we now head for a decision on the Eco-town and Option 4 in the same time frame, early 2009.

 The J.P.C.S.G. would like to take the perceived preference for Option 4 off the table for good, by fairly appraising the consultation results.  We still don't know whether the Eco-town proposal for 5000 houses is in addition to the 4200 extra homes under the Regional Spatial Strategy, indeed their is little encouragement from Government that this is the case.

 The J.P.C.S.G. strongly support Sir Alan Haselhurst's dispersed solution, 'Option 5' as he calls it.  Sharing the pain of the extra houses across Uttlesford, with affordable houses being a key ingredient, would make a lot of sense. We will continue to work on this proposal to try and find consensus."

horizontal rule

One square mile of wheat growing arable land feeds a lot of people

by Jonathan Leech of Henham
 

This land would make a lot of loaves of bread; just see for yourself.

 1 Square mile of proposed arable land equals 640 acres

 At say 4 tonnes per acre, that equals 2560 tonnes of grain

 Take a small to medium loaf of 800 grams. A loaf consists of quite a lot of water and other ingredients, but let’s assume for this calculation that 70% of a loaf is wheat, therefore 560 grams of every loaf is wheat.

 2560 tonnes X 1000 = 2,560,000 kilograms x 1000 = 2,560,000,000 grams

Divided this by 560 grams per loaf = 4,571,428 loaves lost to concrete.

Yes 4 ½ million loaves lost per year forever.

 This kind of loss would be totally unacceptable, but the Government wants 10 or 12 of these Eco towns??? So we would need to import ever more food.

horizontal rule

Looking back at Toot-Toot Bridge - Aug 2001 A further very interesting article by Jonathan Leech on Henham on the possible flooding problems we could face with an Eco-town

Click here to view

horizontal rule

Read what the Campaign to Protect Rural Essex have to say -

"COUNTRYSIDE campaigners have a launched a stinging attack on proposals to build an ‘eco-town’ at Elsenham. Campaign to Protect Rural Essex has strongly condemned the way the plan has been presented and said it will be forced on the local community and not part of a local development framework or regional spatial strategy."

Click here to read on

horizontal rule

‘Eco-town’ dash is unacceptable' says the East of England Regional Assembly - Click here

horizontal rule

Stop Stansted Expansion against 'Airport Town'

 Click here to view their representation to the Department of Communities and Local Government Consultation.

horizontal rule

Monday 30th June 2008 - The end of the Consultation period and Rally in London
 
On behalf of the Joint Parishes Steering Group I would like to thank everyone for your magnificent response to the Department of Communities and Local Government Consultation. As you are well aware, Chris Bush from Elsenham and I from Henham have been collating copies of all the letters you have been sending to the Consultation Team, The Rt. Hon, Caroline Flint. M.P. Minister for Housing and Planning, and the Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Haselhurst M.P. our member of Parliament.  The quality of your representations has been of the highest standard and those receiving them cannot fail to have been impressed.

With the approval of the J.P.S.G. Chris and I made additional copies of your letters.  Whilst we recognise that we have not received copies from every one, on the morning of the last day of the consultation we had well over a thousand plus a hundred or more from outside our villages.  Every one condemned the plan to build the eco-town.  Additionally, we felt that because this plan had been devised on the back of the notorious 'Preferred Option Four' we decided that the D.C.L.G. should have copies of the letters you sent in to the Uttlesford Consultation earlier this year as well.  These we had bound into 32 spiral backed volumes.  In total between the two consultations well over two thousand letters.

Led by Nick Baker and armed with the letters, the petition you have all been signing, plenty of banners and in good voice, fifty of us from Elsenham and Henham set off for London at 9.00am on Monday 30th  in a coach supplied by Uttlesford District Council to attend a national rally of campaigners against the now 14 short-listed eco-town sites.

Photo opportunity outside the shops in Elsenham
About to set off
 
Outside Parliament
on arrival
We reassembled outside the Houses of Parliament and then, consistent with the average age of the group, like a bomb-blast headed off in various directions in search of loos and cups of tea.
   
Other groups began to arrive on College Green and we were joined by our M.P. Sir Alan Sir Alan with our protesters and others
Sir Alan et al
   
Various representing M.Ps
Could this be a 'sitting' of MPs
MPs representing other affected areas arrived and it began to get noisier and noisier with each group trying to outdo each other.
   
The press were out in full force and many interviews were given.  Unfortunately the TV coverage later in the day was to say the least disappointing.

Click here to see the BBC's response

Press out in force
say something Terry
   

promises promises
Grant Shapps M.P. the Shadow Housing Minister arrived and addressed the meeting.
   
At just before 1.00pm we all went into Parliament through quite heavy security to attend a meeting chaired by Grant Shapps.  It is a long time since I had been inside the seat of our Government and I like everyone could not but feel impressed.

Here Chris and I are holding two of the ten ring binders holding your letters.

Bill and Chris
thank goodness no more copying
   

very impressive room
We all assembled in a very imposing Committee Room 14.  Originally they were only going to allow in about 120 but many more squeezed in.  Grant Shapps stated that the Conservatives would not support the Eco-town proposals and called them 'Eco-Spin' and Eco-Con' .  'They were anything but Eco-Friendly'.
   
All of the six MPs spoke (except Sir Alan who was engaged elsewhere on House business) and members of the audience were encouraged to ask questions and make statements.  Two of our District Councillors, Howard Rolfe and David Morson contributed. At the end of the meeting all your letters were collected by representatives of the Department of Communities and Local Government and the petition was taken to Downing Street and handed in by Alan Hatherway.  Whilst we were making our way home, Don Sturgeon and Petrina Lees attended a meeting with Caroline Flint together with other representatives of the campaigning groups. Don and Petrina had met Ms. Flint last week in Uttlesford.  She recognised them and invited them to sit at the front.

Of the meeting, Don said,

'It was very clear that the rest of the group were up for a fight and the meeting did get a bit aggressive and negative. The questioning was very subjective and repetitive, causing the Minister at one stage to slap her hand on the table in front of her! Due to the low quality of the meeting, Petrina decided against asking a question and I kept the question I had to a general issue relating to the role of David Lock with the Government and with the developers. I acknowledged that we'd had a constructive meeting with the Minister last Thursday with our main concern being that UDC continued to treat LDF Option 4(strongly in favour) and the Eco-Town (strongly against) as separate issues when everyone involved in the process is fully aware they are inextricably linked.'

   
Where to we go from here?

Firstly, may we thank all who wrote letters, came to London, donated money (we have had a great response from the latest membership scheme) prepared posters and banners and a special thanks to Gary Willis at Millways for providing the binders, paper and printing facilities for the letter copying, Ken Forbes for spiral binding our option4 letters and Jonathon Leech and Margaret Shaw for contributing pictures.

Secondly, we have a Joint Parishes meeting on Wednesday and we will take stock.  Nick Baker will be sending out a message via this site in the very near future, outlining the next stages of the process and how we are going to tackle it.  In the meantime well done everybody.  We are getting there.  - BB

   

horizontal rule

Caroline Flint MP the Housing Minister visits Uttlesford and Look East Visits Elsenham - Thurs 26th June

In anticipation of a eco-site visit to Elsenham by the Housing Minister Caroline Flint a BBC Look East camera team came to interview her. However, she was delayed at another nearby visit and Look East so they had to put up with interviewing the locals.  A very sympathetic piece appeared on the lunchtime programme and longer pieces in the evening and late news. Unfortunately, in editing the interviews they chose one interview which could have been easily mistaken for an audition for 'Grumpy Old Men.'  Fortunately, at the time of writing the repeat on the Look East Web page is not working.

Petrina being interviewed
   
At lunchtime, Ms. Flint went to the District Council Offices at Uttlesford and and received a presentation from Fairfield and then attended a private meeting with our MP, Sir Allan Haselhurst, the Deputy Director of the D.C.L.G. Councillors David Morson and Catherine Dean, Don Sturgeon and Petrina Lees.  John Mitchell and Roger Harborough were observers.  Don has described the meeting as very constructive and came away with the impression that an Eco-town in Elsenham was by no means a 'Done Deal'.  Don continued,

"Our dispersement proposals for housing in line with Sir Alan Haselhurst's Parish Council's meeting, and in particular the affordable housing, was clearly a welcome part of our initiatives and very well received by the Minister. We have been given access to the Deputy Director of the DCLG with whom we intend meeting in London within the next two weeks.

The Minister did confirm that she has concerns about the economic situation and developers financial commitment. She also made it clear that although the airport is there, this proposal for an eco-town at Elsenham and Henham should not be considered as an airport town."

David Morson who was present at the earlier meeting summarised as follows, "

At today’s first Meeting with Caroline Flint the following 4 outcomes were apparent.

John Mitchell made it clear that Uttlesford was working well within its capacity to deal with its housing issues and politely implied we have no need of an Eco Town.

The Fairfield Partnership failed badly to convince anyone about the suitability of the road infrastructure and how they proposed to provide 50% the town’s employment at the site in their presentation.

Caroline Flint warned Fairfield that she would need to see evidence of their active engagement with the Community over their proposals by September.

The worry is that there could be some reduced Eco type Settlement with the 3,000 houses allocated in Option 4 of the LDF, instead of the Eco Town of 5,000. The Minister was impressed by how briskly Uttlesford had got on with the LDF in comparison with other Local Authorities!!

horizontal rule

Essex County Council Slams Eco-town in Elsenham

Click here to view a damning report

horizontal rule

Judicial Review Launched

'The campaign group against the proposed Middle Quinton eco-town outside Stratford-upon-Avon has formally lodged its application for Judicial Review of the eco-town process.

The Better Accessible and Responsible Development (BARD) campaign is seeking a declaration that the government's eco-towns programme is unlawful and should be halted until proper and full consultation has taken place.

It is the first application of its kind by any of the campaigners against 15 short-listed sites'

 It is based on the consultation, etc. Interesting!. Timetable as before, 2/3 months to see if it has merit. Full hearing 8/9 months. I think it's value lies in the fact that the Gov. knows it has been taken to JR.

Nick

horizontal rule

Click here to see powerpoint presentation Click on the picture to see a splendid presentation by Jonathan Leech, a Henham Resident

horizontal rule

The NIMBY

The following is taken from the Daily Telegraph book, ' People Power' where a passage from The New Statesman 2004 is quoted:

"The NIMBY is not the enemy of progress but its begetter. In a land, and increasingly a world where democracy is bought and where global triumphs over local every time, the NIMBYs, - those prepared to defend what they know and love against the depredations of the disengaged - are the true heroes.  It is they, not the house-builders and their tame ministers, who represent the best of what democracy is about"

horizontal rule

East of England Plan

The Revision to the Regional Spatial Strategy for the East of England has just been published.  There is no apparent specific reference to Elsenham or Henham, but under Section 3 - Spacial Strategy at para.  3.5 et seq. the document does talk about Growth Areas, Growth Points and Eco-Towns and mentions the Department for Communities and Local Government consultation document ‘Eco-towns – Living a greener future’. mentioned below

Click on picture for Document
(131 pages)

horizontal rule

E-Petition

Please visit the on-line petition to 10 Downing Street, viz:-

'We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Abandon plans to build an Eco Town in Elsenham & Henham.'

which you can find by going to:-

 Abandon plans to build an Eco Town in Elsenham & Henham

Please forward this to all your friends and family so they can sign up as well

horizontal rule

Site Designer and Manager

 Bill Bates