|










| |
|
Links to other items on this page. |
| Eco-Con |East
of England Plan|E-Petitions|
Eco-Town in Elsenham|Limehouse
|Full
Council Meeting 22nd April
|Judicial Review |Quiz
Night|
(Note - many of the items that
have previously appeared on this page have been transferred either to the
Archive page or the
History page.) |
|
What is Happening? |
|
Please rest assured that
the Working Party and Steering Group are beavering away on your behalf on how to respond to
the threat of the Eco-Town. We are collating advice from as many
sources as we can and will soon be in a position to similarly advise you on
how to respond to the consultation.
(please see
latest news from our U.D.C. Councillor, David Morson, but do not write
yet until the advice above has been published - BB) |
|

ECO-CON
I unreservedly believe that that
attaching the prefix 'Eco' to government planning initiatives is a complete
and utter confidence trick. We all understand the need to address
global warming, properly conserving energy and the the discipline of
re-cycling waste. However, in the midst of the proposal to build a so called
eco-town in Elsenham/Henham, we find that we have in Henham perhaps one of
the most advanced eco-friendly houses in the country. This house was
built at approximately 75% above the cost of what an average similar sized
house. How is it possible that our government could believe their own
spin and that of developers that an eco-town, and in particular the
proportion of low cost affordable housing, is in any way financially viable?
This is just an excuse to appropriate nearly a square mile of prime arable
land for building houses close to Stansted Airport; land which has
contributed to feeding this country for well over a thousand years and is
more than ever needed now. It is nothing less than vandalism of our
countryside on a huge scale. How can it in any way can the proposal be
contributing to making our planet a better place?
On Tuesday 13th May. Simon Lee, the
owner of the aforementioned house, addressed the full council meeting of
Uttlesford District Council on the subject. Please
click
here to see what he said. - BB |
|

Politics Today
On TV
This
coming Sunday at 12.20pm
on BBC 1 (East) TV. Petrina Lees of Elsenham spent the day filming with the
BBC talking to them on the subject of Eco-Towns.
also
Public Meetings
- have been arranged for
2nd June
7.00pm
at Henham
and 8.00pm at Elsenham. Keynote speaker Grant
Chapps, Shadow Minister for Housing, then the topic will
be 'How to respond to the consultation'.
More details to follow, particularly of other hopeful guest speakers.
also
Joint Parishes Steering Group
The next Meeting of the Joint Parishes
Steering Group will be held on
Thursday 22nd May 2008
7.00pm
- Elsenham Memorial Hall
Agenda

|
|
East of England Plan
The Revision to the Regional Spatial Strategy for the East of England
has just been published. There is no apparent specific reference to
Elsenham or Henham, but under Section 3 - Spacial Strategy at para.
3.5 et seq. the document does talk about Growth Areas, Growth Points and
Eco-Towns and mentions the
Department for Communities and Local Government consultation document ‘Eco-towns
– Living a greener future’. mentioned
below |

Click on picture for
Document
(131 pages) |
|

|
|
Judicial Review
It seems that in
respect of the Judicial Review application brought by
Twigden Homes and Bellwinch Homes (see
original article) of which
the J.P.S.G. was an interested party, the judge has decided not to send the
application forward for a hearing. (click
here to see his judgement.)
We have heard from the solicitors for
Twigden Homes and Bellwinch Homes and there will not be an appeal hearing. |
Save Our Village
Quiz Night
Saturday 21st June
7.30pm for 8.00pm
at Elsenham Village Hall
£8 per ticket - Payable at the door
Food provided but bring
your own drink please.
Tables of 8 - please book
through Petrina on 816675 or Jennifer on 814434
|
|

|
|
E-Petition
Please visit the
on-line petition to 10 Downing Street, viz:-
'We
the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Abandon plans to build an Eco
Town in Elsenham & Henham.'
which you can find
by going to:-
Abandon
plans to build an Eco Town in Elsenham
& Henham
Please forward this
to all your friends and family so they can sign up as well

|
|
Full
Uttlesford District Council Meeting Tuesday 22nd April, 7.30pm |
|
Minutes |
|
There was a good turnout
of Elsenham and Henham residents who filled the public seating in the main
chamber, the gallery and an over-spill into the annex. The reason was
to hear items 13 and 14 on the
Agenda.
However, prior to the
meeting starting, John Savident, a resident of Henham gave an impassioned
speech surrounding the paradox that the Conservatives were tabling a motion
that the council was totally against the concept of an Eco-town in Elsenham
and Henham yet still supported Option 4 in the same location. He urged
that the council consider that as a result of the consultation there was
ample evidence to now abandon Option 4 and work with their electorate to
prevent the Eco-town development. He stated that if they did so, the
allegations of hypocrisy and duplicity would 'magically disappear'. He
received a rousing ovation from attending residents which apparently is not
'good form' for a council meeting. A copy of John's speech can be
viewed by
clicking here. Also read what the Herts
and Essex Observer has to say by
clicking here and going to page 9.
(click once on the page to zoom in)
|
|
There then followed a
number of questions and observations from Councillors and in particular from
Councillor Morson who wished to know when Uttlesford were first aware of a
bid by Fairfield to build an Eco-town in Elsenham/Henham, especially in the
light of a document called
Land North-East of Elsenham - Eco-town and
Expression of Interest, dated
October 2007. It had apparently been lodged with the council in
October/November 2007. He particularly asked Councillor Barker when
she had first become aware of it and she replied that she was not aware of
it until 'this evening'.
Councillor Alan Dean asked
about the selection of Option 4 being the subject of Judicial Revue and
Councillor Ketteridge, the leader of the Conservative majority, responded
that an application had been made to a judge and that at this time there was
no Judicial Revue.
Following the formal
opening of the meeting Councillor Catherine Dean, the Chairman of the
meeting moved quickly to Item 13 on the agenda. which was in the
hands of Mr. John Mitchell, the Acting Ch. Exec. and Chief Planning Officer,
viz. -
|
|
'To receive the attached report on the
Department for Communities and Local Government consultation document ‘Eco-towns
– Living a greener future’.
Mr Mitchell talked to a circulated
document. This can be viewed by
clicking here. Whilst I cannot attempt to
summarise Mr. Mitchell's presentation, on the first page of the his document
was a reference to the alleged fact in the Eco-towns - Living a greener
future report, Uttlesford had 3,954 on the waiting list, whereas
Mr. Mitchell stated it was in fact about 1200. (Interesting to note
that later in the following debate Councillor R. Chamberlain gave a further
informed breakdown of of the 1200 figure which indicated that Uttlesford's
real housing need was considerably less than this). |
 |
|
|
Item 14 on the agenda then followed. It was:-
(i) To consider the following Notice of Motion proposed by Councillor Susan.
Barker:
‘This Council is totally opposed to the development
of an Eco Town north east of Elsenham as proposed in the Department of
Communities and Local Government’s consultative paper, "Eco-Towns – Living a
greener future" published on Thursday 3 April and will campaign to have this
proposal removed from the short list.'
This was amended by Councillor Barker, (the exact wording
will appear in the minutes when published, but see below) to include any
other such new town in the U.D.C. area. The Liberal Democrats
submitted a further amendment which sought to re-start the L.D.F process.
Full discussion then followed.
In support of her motion Councillor
Barker said the following,
Click here.
(For the first time since this whole process started I listened to her with
some degree of optimism.)
The Conservatives stated that they could
not abandon Option 4 until the due process was completed. They were
afraid of Judicial Revue on their decision (in spite of the fact that if
they removed Option 4 from the scene, one Judicial Revue in the pipeline
would probably disappear. Who is going to complain, apart from
Fairfield of course?) It is quite possible that due to their
prevarication, their decision on Option 4 would be delivered after the
government had made up their minds about the final short list.
Bizarre!
In the event, the Lib. Dems. amendment
was defeated and the motion carried as far as I could see unanimously.
I and others left the building with mixed emotions on what we had seen.
Maybe some slight degree of optimism. We shall have to wait and see,
but above all a message to the local politicians, be transparent and for
goodness sake start working together. |
|
|
|

|
|
Two Public Meetings held on Wednesday 16th April - 6.00pm at Henham Village
Hall and 8.00pm at Elsenham Village Hall
Both meetings were very well attended.
They were both chaired by Nick Baker, the chairman of the Joint Parishes
Steering Group. Although the
agendas were the same at both, owing to
overlapping engagements the speakers in some instances differed.
At the Henham meeting,
Cllr. Morson spoke about the Government proposal for Eco-towns and stated
that we were currently in yet another consultation period which would end on
30th June. This would be followed by a 'Sustainability Appraisal' from
July to October and a decision on the final 10 proposals somewhere between
November and February. As yet it is still unclear whether Uttlesford
would still have to build 4,200 houses in addition to the 5000 proposed in
the Eco-town. He stated that of the 5000, 1800 would be 'affordable'
homes and that 60% on people living in the town would supposedly be employed
locally.
David's speech contained
many point included in his latest newsletter which can be seen by
clicking here. Cllr. Alan Dean spoke
at the Elsenham meeting whilst covering many of the points made by David, he
stated the Lib Dems were going to move an amendment at the full U.D.C.
Council Meeting on 22nd April (see above) to Susan Barker's motion which
related to the dropping of option 4. He also talked about the fact
that vVarying opinions have been
expressed about whether central government’s proposal for a 5-8,000 homes
(or more) eco-town at North East Elsenham would be additional to existing
housing targets.
Since the meeting he
has submitted a paper which fully explains his views.
Click here to view.
Ray Gooding, our Essex
County Councillor stated that E.C.C. were totally opposed to Eco-towns
as well as a second runway at Stansted. He believed that whilst BAA
were denying it, the two proposals were inextricably linked, particularly in
relation to the alleged additional 13,000 jobs the new runway would support.
He questioned the Government logic of supporting a highly polluting airport
expansion whilst next door also supporting a supposed zero carbon
building project.
Don Sturgeon (Henham) and
Petrina Lees (Elsenham) spoke about the work of the J.P.S.G. and that we
were still fighting on two fronts, option 4 and the Eco-town proposal.
In relation to the Eco-town and how we can best fight our corner the
were working hard to seek the best planning and legal advice and on our own
research to see how we can best fight this new campaign. Until we know
more both Don and Petrina asked that residents initially do nothing.
This was much the same advice given in the early days of fighting option 4.
At the earliest possible moment we would call another meeting to advise
residents on how best they can help.
At both meetings Don urged
residents to donate as much money as they could to the fighting fund.
He stressed that to get the best planning and legal advice for the Eco-town
campaign we would have to find a lot more money.
(Please see the fund
raising page on how you can donate). Don praised the
efforts of people so far and gave advance notice of a fund raising
Rally Rounders Tournament to be held on Sunday 1st June at Woodend Green.
Click here to see full details.
At both meetings Nick took
questions from the floor. Many good suggestions were made and he
promised that they would be followed up.
The Date of the next
meetings will be publicised as soon as possible. |
|

|
|
Eco Town in Elsenham
and Henham
On Thursday 3rd April we were
devastated to hear that the land to the north-east of Elsenham (most of
which is in the Parish of Henham) had been put on a short list of 15
locations to be developed into Eco Towns (click
here to view). The scale of the proposed development is far
beyond what was envisaged by Option 4. Later on this year the list
will be reduced to a final list of ten.
The announcement was made by Caroline
Flint, the Minister for Housing and Planning. The Department of
Communities and Local Government have published a document called 'Eco-
Towns, Living a Greener Future' which may be viewed by clicking on the
picture.

The Joint Parish Council Steering Group
met on Thursday 10th April when the matter was high on the agenda. We
will be holding public meetings on Wednesday 16th April (see above for
times, etc.) Clearly, we are now fighting on two fronts. The
application for the Eco-Town is based on the U.D.C's preferred Option 4.
However at a press call on Friday 4th April at Elsenham station car park
(which overlooks the blighted landscape), Uttlesford Conservative
Councillors turned out in force together with our MP, Sir Alan Haselhurst,
to state their total opposition to an Eco-Town in Uttlesford. How can
they U.D.C. Councillors still be in favour of their preferred Option 4
whilst being against an Eco-Town in the same place?
A little while ago, Fairfield Partnership
supplied a 44 page document called 'Elsenham -
A Strategic Master Plan
Vision (dated January 2008) to
Parish Councils. I have received permission from them to reproduce it on
this site with a reminder that all diagrams maps etc are subject to copy
write and must not be reproduced without permission.
This is the
basis of their submission to the Government. Click on the picture to
view it.

It is our opinion and that held by
others, that the only way Uttlesford District Council can dig themselves out of this mess is by
admitting now that Option 4 was a mistake.
|
|

|
|
Limehouse I have now
completed my third complete trawl through the Limehouse data base of
Henham representations. The Planning Department are still very slow in
adding your objections. To date, only about a fifth of Henham's 532
letters have been put on the system. Where I feel that your objections have
not been properly stated I have been asking the planning department to
review their entries. Chris Bush in Elsenham is doing the same for the
copies of letters he has received and other representations as well
However, we need you to check your
entries as well. Please
click here to go to Limehouse. When you get there, click on the
'Search' button on the menu and enter your surname in the Search field.
You may find that either you have not been registered yet, you have been
registered but no comments have been added, or your representations have
been added.
If you
are not happy with how your views have been represented, please let the
Planning Policy Team at Uttlesford know at
planning@uttlesford.gov.uk
and if you so wish, copy your complaint to us at
saveourvillage@live.co.uk.
Update on 14th May
from Melanie Jones of the Planning Department
As an update we have now finished entering the representations
on Limehouse. All the letters have now been scanned and we are making
good progress on making them "duly made" so that they will be
available to view on the public side and there should be new entries
now each day. (There are still 596 pending but we are getting through
them quite quickly). |
|
|
| |
Site Designer and Manager
Bill Bates
|